Mercurial > hg > graal-compiler
diff graal/com.oracle.truffle.api.dsl.test/src/com/oracle/truffle/api/dsl/test/CachedTest.java @ 19289:62c43fcf5be2
Truffle-DSL: implement @Cached and fixes for the new guard expression syntax.
author | Christian Humer <christian.humer@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 03 Feb 2015 15:07:07 +0100 |
parents | |
children | 4cba24bef2ee |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/graal/com.oracle.truffle.api.dsl.test/src/com/oracle/truffle/api/dsl/test/CachedTest.java Tue Feb 03 15:07:07 2015 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,320 @@ +/* + * Copyright (c) 2015, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. + * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER. + * + * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as + * published by the Free Software Foundation. + * + * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License + * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that + * accompanied this code). + * + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version + * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, + * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA. + * + * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA + * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any + * questions. + */ +package com.oracle.truffle.api.dsl.test; + +import static com.oracle.truffle.api.dsl.test.TestHelper.*; +import static org.junit.Assert.*; + +import org.junit.*; + +import com.oracle.truffle.api.*; +import com.oracle.truffle.api.dsl.*; +import com.oracle.truffle.api.dsl.test.CachedTestFactory.BoundCacheFactory; +import com.oracle.truffle.api.dsl.test.CachedTestFactory.BoundCacheOverflowFactory; +import com.oracle.truffle.api.dsl.test.CachedTestFactory.TestBoundCacheOverflowContainsFactory; +import com.oracle.truffle.api.dsl.test.CachedTestFactory.TestCacheFieldFactory; +import com.oracle.truffle.api.dsl.test.CachedTestFactory.TestCacheMethodFactory; +import com.oracle.truffle.api.dsl.test.CachedTestFactory.TestCacheNodeFieldFactory; +import com.oracle.truffle.api.dsl.test.CachedTestFactory.TestGuardWithCachedAndDynamicParameterFactory; +import com.oracle.truffle.api.dsl.test.CachedTestFactory.TestGuardWithJustCachedParameterFactory; +import com.oracle.truffle.api.dsl.test.CachedTestFactory.TestMultipleCachesFactory; +import com.oracle.truffle.api.dsl.test.CachedTestFactory.UnboundCacheFactory; +import com.oracle.truffle.api.dsl.test.TypeSystemTest.ValueNode; + +@SuppressWarnings("unused") +public class CachedTest { + + @Test + public void testUnboundCache() { + CallTarget root = createCallTarget(UnboundCacheFactory.getInstance()); + assertEquals(42, root.call(42)); + assertEquals(42, root.call(43)); + assertEquals(42, root.call(44)); + } + + @NodeChild + static class UnboundCache extends ValueNode { + @Specialization + static int do1(int value, @Cached("value") int cachedValue) { + return cachedValue; + } + } + + @Test + public void testBoundCache() { + CallTarget root = createCallTarget(BoundCacheFactory.getInstance()); + assertEquals(42, root.call(42)); + assertEquals(43, root.call(43)); + assertEquals(44, root.call(44)); + try { + root.call(45); + fail(); + } catch (UnsupportedSpecializationException e) { + } + } + + @NodeChild + static class BoundCache extends ValueNode { + + @Specialization(guards = "value == cachedValue", limit = "3") + static int do1(int value, @Cached("value") int cachedValue) { + return cachedValue; + } + + } + + @Test + public void testBoundCacheOverflow() { + CallTarget root = createCallTarget(BoundCacheOverflowFactory.getInstance()); + assertEquals(42, root.call(42)); + assertEquals(43, root.call(43)); + assertEquals(-1, root.call(44)); + assertEquals(42, root.call(42)); + assertEquals(43, root.call(43)); + assertEquals(-1, root.call(44)); + } + + @NodeChild + static class BoundCacheOverflow extends ValueNode { + + @Specialization(guards = "value == cachedValue", limit = "2") + static int do1(int value, @Cached("value") int cachedValue) { + return cachedValue; + } + + @Specialization + static int do2(int value) { + return -1; + } + + } + + @Test + public void testBoundCacheOverflowContains() { + CallTarget root = createCallTarget(TestBoundCacheOverflowContainsFactory.getInstance()); + assertEquals(42, root.call(42)); + assertEquals(43, root.call(43)); + assertEquals(-1, root.call(44)); + assertEquals(-1, root.call(42)); + assertEquals(-1, root.call(43)); + assertEquals(-1, root.call(44)); + } + + @NodeChild + static class TestBoundCacheOverflowContains extends ValueNode { + + @Specialization(guards = "value == cachedValue", limit = "2") + static int do1(int value, @Cached("value") int cachedValue) { + return cachedValue; + } + + @Specialization(contains = "do1") + static int do2(int value) { + return -1; + } + + } + + @Test + public void testCacheField() { + CallTarget root = createCallTarget(TestCacheFieldFactory.getInstance()); + assertEquals(3, root.call(42)); + assertEquals(3, root.call(43)); + } + + @NodeChild + static class TestCacheField extends ValueNode { + + protected int field = 3; + + @Specialization() + static int do1(int value, @Cached("field") int cachedValue) { + return cachedValue; + } + + } + + @Test + public void testCacheNodeField() { + CallTarget root = createCallTarget(TestCacheNodeFieldFactory.getInstance(), 21); + assertEquals(21, root.call(42)); + assertEquals(21, root.call(43)); + } + + @NodeChild + @NodeField(name = "field", type = int.class) + static class TestCacheNodeField extends ValueNode { + + @Specialization + static int do1(int value, @Cached("field") int cachedValue) { + return cachedValue; + } + + } + + @Test + public void testCacheMethod() { + TestCacheMethod.invocations = 0; + CallTarget root = createCallTarget(TestCacheMethodFactory.getInstance()); + assertEquals(42, root.call(42)); + assertEquals(42, root.call(43)); + assertEquals(42, root.call(44)); + assertEquals(1, TestCacheMethod.invocations); + } + + @NodeChild + static class TestCacheMethod extends ValueNode { + + static int invocations = 0; + + @Specialization + static int do1(int value, @Cached("someMethod(value)") int cachedValue) { + return cachedValue; + } + + static int someMethod(int value) { + invocations++; + return value; + } + + } + + @Test + public void testGuardWithJustCachedParameter() { + TestGuardWithJustCachedParameter.invocations = 0; + CallTarget root = createCallTarget(TestGuardWithJustCachedParameterFactory.getInstance()); + assertEquals(42, root.call(42)); + assertEquals(42, root.call(43)); + assertEquals(42, root.call(44)); + // guards with just cached parameters are just invoked on the slow path + assertEquals(assertionsEnabled() ? 4 : 1, TestGuardWithJustCachedParameter.invocations); + } + + @NodeChild + static class TestGuardWithJustCachedParameter extends ValueNode { + + static int invocations = 0; + + @Specialization(guards = "someMethod(cachedValue)") + static int do1(int value, @Cached("value") int cachedValue) { + return cachedValue; + } + + static boolean someMethod(int value) { + invocations++; + return true; + } + + } + + @Test + public void testGuardWithCachedAndDynamicParameter() { + TestGuardWithCachedAndDynamicParameter.cachedMethodInvocations = 0; + TestGuardWithCachedAndDynamicParameter.dynamicMethodInvocations = 0; + CallTarget root = createCallTarget(TestGuardWithCachedAndDynamicParameterFactory.getInstance()); + assertEquals(42, root.call(42)); + assertEquals(42, root.call(43)); + assertEquals(42, root.call(44)); + // guards with just cached parameters are just invoked on the slow path + assertEquals(assertionsEnabled() ? 4 : 1, TestGuardWithCachedAndDynamicParameter.cachedMethodInvocations); + assertEquals(4, TestGuardWithCachedAndDynamicParameter.dynamicMethodInvocations); + } + + @NodeChild + static class TestGuardWithCachedAndDynamicParameter extends ValueNode { + + static int cachedMethodInvocations = 0; + static int dynamicMethodInvocations = 0; + + @Specialization(guards = {"dynamicMethod(value)", "cachedMethod(cachedValue)"}) + static int do1(int value, @Cached("value") int cachedValue) { + return cachedValue; + } + + static boolean cachedMethod(int value) { + cachedMethodInvocations++; + return true; + } + + static boolean dynamicMethod(int value) { + dynamicMethodInvocations++; + return true; + } + + } + + @NodeChild + static class TestMultipleCaches extends ValueNode { + + @Specialization + static int do1(int value, @Cached("value") int cachedValue1, @Cached("value") int cachedValue2) { + return cachedValue1 + cachedValue2; + } + + } + + @Test + public void testMultipleCaches() { + CallTarget root = createCallTarget(TestMultipleCachesFactory.getInstance()); + assertEquals(42, root.call(21)); + assertEquals(42, root.call(22)); + assertEquals(42, root.call(23)); + } + + @NodeChild + static class CachedError1 extends ValueNode { + @Specialization + static int do1(int value, @ExpectError("Incompatible return type int. The expression type must be equal to the parameter type double.")// + @Cached("value") double cachedValue) { + return value; + } + } + + @NodeChild + static class CachedError2 extends ValueNode { + + // caches are not allowed to make backward references + + @Specialization + static int do1(int value, + @ExpectError("The initializer expression of parameter 'cachedValue1' binds unitialized parameter 'cachedValue2. Reorder the parameters to resolve the problem.") @Cached("cachedValue2") int cachedValue1, + @Cached("value") int cachedValue2) { + return cachedValue1 + cachedValue2; + } + + } + + @NodeChild + static class CachedError3 extends ValueNode { + + // cyclic dependency between cached expressions + @Specialization + static int do1(int value, + @ExpectError("The initializer expression of parameter 'cachedValue1' binds unitialized parameter 'cachedValue2. Reorder the parameters to resolve the problem.") @Cached("cachedValue2") int cachedValue1, + @Cached("cachedValue1") int cachedValue2) { + return cachedValue1 + cachedValue2; + } + + } + +}