comparison src/share/vm/runtime/advancedThresholdPolicy.cpp @ 16107:c7db9dc73694

disabled dialing C1 compilation back to partial profiling when Graal is the top tier compiler
author Doug Simon <doug.simon@oracle.com>
date Fri, 13 Jun 2014 18:42:33 +0200
parents 4ca6dc0799b6
children 52b4284cb496
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
16106:5d84706642ce 16107:c7db9dc73694
343 case CompLevel_none: 343 case CompLevel_none:
344 // If we were at full profile level, would we switch to full opt? 344 // If we were at full profile level, would we switch to full opt?
345 if (common(p, method, CompLevel_full_profile, disable_feedback) == CompLevel_full_optimization) { 345 if (common(p, method, CompLevel_full_profile, disable_feedback) == CompLevel_full_optimization) {
346 next_level = CompLevel_full_optimization; 346 next_level = CompLevel_full_optimization;
347 } else if ((this->*p)(i, b, cur_level)) { 347 } else if ((this->*p)(i, b, cur_level)) {
348 #ifdef COMPILERGRAAL
349 // Since Graal takes a while to warm up, its queue inevitably backs up during
350 // early VM execution. As of 2014-06-13, Graal's inliner assumes that the root
351 // compilation method and all potential inlinees have mature profiles (which
352 // includes type profiling). If it sees immature profiles, Graal's inliner
353 // can perform pathologically bad (e.g., causing OutOfMemoryErrors due to
354 // exploring/inlining too many graphs). Since a rewrite of the inliner is
355 // in progress, we simply disable the dialing back heuristic for now and will
356 // revisit this decision once the new inliner is completed.
357 next_level = CompLevel_full_profile;
358 #else
348 // C1-generated fully profiled code is about 30% slower than the limited profile 359 // C1-generated fully profiled code is about 30% slower than the limited profile
349 // code that has only invocation and backedge counters. The observation is that 360 // code that has only invocation and backedge counters. The observation is that
350 // if C2 queue is large enough we can spend too much time in the fully profiled code 361 // if C2 queue is large enough we can spend too much time in the fully profiled code
351 // while waiting for C2 to pick the method from the queue. To alleviate this problem 362 // while waiting for C2 to pick the method from the queue. To alleviate this problem
352 // we introduce a feedback on the C2 queue size. If the C2 queue is sufficiently long 363 // we introduce a feedback on the C2 queue size. If the C2 queue is sufficiently long
356 Tier3DelayOn * compiler_count(CompLevel_full_optimization)) { 367 Tier3DelayOn * compiler_count(CompLevel_full_optimization)) {
357 next_level = CompLevel_limited_profile; 368 next_level = CompLevel_limited_profile;
358 } else { 369 } else {
359 next_level = CompLevel_full_profile; 370 next_level = CompLevel_full_profile;
360 } 371 }
372 #endif
361 } 373 }
362 break; 374 break;
363 case CompLevel_limited_profile: 375 case CompLevel_limited_profile:
364 if (is_method_profiled(method)) { 376 if (is_method_profiled(method)) {
365 // Special case: we got here because this method was fully profiled in the interpreter. 377 // Special case: we got here because this method was fully profiled in the interpreter.