diff src/cpu/x86/vm/templateInterpreter_x86_64.cpp @ 1135:e66fd840cb6b

6893081: method handle & invokedynamic code needs additional cleanup (post 6815692, 6858164) Summary: During the work for 6829187 we have fixed a number of basic bugs which are logically grouped with 6815692 and 6858164 but which must be reviewed and pushed separately. Reviewed-by: kvn, never
author twisti
date Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:38:08 +0100
parents 85f13cdfbc1d
children ddb7834449d0
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/src/cpu/x86/vm/templateInterpreter_x86_64.cpp	Mon Jan 04 07:04:46 2010 -0800
+++ b/src/cpu/x86/vm/templateInterpreter_x86_64.cpp	Mon Jan 04 18:38:08 2010 +0100
@@ -449,8 +449,12 @@
   __ addptr(rax, stack_base);
   __ subptr(rax, stack_size);
 
+  // Use the maximum number of pages we might bang.
+  const int max_pages = StackShadowPages > (StackRedPages+StackYellowPages) ? StackShadowPages :
+                                                                              (StackRedPages+StackYellowPages);
+
   // add in the red and yellow zone sizes
-  __ addptr(rax, (StackRedPages + StackYellowPages) * page_size);
+  __ addptr(rax, max_pages * page_size);
 
   // check against the current stack bottom
   __ cmpptr(rsp, rax);
@@ -1502,8 +1506,10 @@
          tempcount* Interpreter::stackElementWords() + popframe_extra_args;
   if (interpreter_frame != NULL) {
 #ifdef ASSERT
-    assert(caller->unextended_sp() == interpreter_frame->interpreter_frame_sender_sp(),
-           "Frame not properly walkable");
+    if (!EnableMethodHandles)
+      // @@@ FIXME: Should we correct interpreter_frame_sender_sp in the calling sequences?
+      // Probably, since deoptimization doesn't work yet.
+      assert(caller->unextended_sp() == interpreter_frame->interpreter_frame_sender_sp(), "Frame not properly walkable");
     assert(caller->sp() == interpreter_frame->sender_sp(), "Frame not properly walkable(2)");
 #endif