# HG changeset patch
# User Miguel Garcia <miguel.m.garcia@oracle.com>
# Date 1400415319 -7200
# Node ID 3464575dbe2b62cc1d4e526afe9350deeab93841
# Parent  6ea206e07d55d655b092a4ec5b2cc6984a1c3d73
[inlining-2] typos in source comment

diff -r 6ea206e07d55 -r 3464575dbe2b graal/com.oracle.graal.phases.common/src/com/oracle/graal/phases/common/inlining/InliningPhase.java
--- a/graal/com.oracle.graal.phases.common/src/com/oracle/graal/phases/common/inlining/InliningPhase.java	Sun May 18 14:08:03 2014 +0200
+++ b/graal/com.oracle.graal.phases.common/src/com/oracle/graal/phases/common/inlining/InliningPhase.java	Sun May 18 14:15:19 2014 +0200
@@ -123,12 +123,12 @@
      * <ul>
      * <li>
      * the first step amounts to backtracking, the 2nd one to delving, and the 3rd one also involves
-     * bakctraking (however after may-be inlining).</li>
+     * backtracking (however after may-be inlining).</li>
      * <li>
      * the choice of abandon-and-backtrack or delve-into is depends on
      * {@link InliningPolicy#isWorthInlining} and {@link InliningPolicy#continueInlining}.</li>
      * <li>
-     * the 3rd choice is picked when both of the previous one aren't picked</li>
+     * the 3rd choice is picked when both of the previous ones aren't picked</li>
      * <li>
      * as part of trying-to-inline, {@link InliningPolicy#isWorthInlining} again sees use, but
      * that's another story.</li>