diff src/share/vm/gc_implementation/concurrentMarkSweep/vmCMSOperations.cpp @ 1656:4e5661ba9d98

6944166: G1: explicit GCs are not always handled correctly Summary: G1 was not handling explicit GCs correctly in many ways. It does now. See the CR for the list of improvements contained in this changeset. Reviewed-by: iveresov, ysr, johnc
author tonyp
date Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:13:17 -0400
parents c18cbe5936b8
children f95d63e2154a
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/src/share/vm/gc_implementation/concurrentMarkSweep/vmCMSOperations.cpp	Mon Jun 28 14:13:18 2010 -0400
+++ b/src/share/vm/gc_implementation/concurrentMarkSweep/vmCMSOperations.cpp	Mon Jun 28 14:13:17 2010 -0400
@@ -234,6 +234,11 @@
   GenCollectedHeap* gch = GenCollectedHeap::heap();
   if (_gc_cause != GCCause::_gc_locker &&
       gch->total_full_collections_completed() <= _full_gc_count_before) {
+    // maybe we should change the condition to test _gc_cause ==
+    // GCCause::_java_lang_system_gc, instead of
+    // _gc_cause != GCCause::_gc_locker
+    assert(_gc_cause == GCCause::_java_lang_system_gc,
+           "the only way to get here if this was a System.gc()-induced GC");
     assert(ExplicitGCInvokesConcurrent, "Error");
     // Now, wait for witnessing concurrent gc cycle to complete,
     // but do so in native mode, because we want to lock the