--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/src/share/vm/asm/register.hpp	Sat Dec 01 00:00:00 2007 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright 2000-2002 Sun Microsystems, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
+ * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
+ *
+ * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+ * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
+ * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
+ * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License
+ * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
+ * accompanied this code).
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
+ * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
+ * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
+ *
+ * Please contact Sun Microsystems, Inc., 4150 Network Circle, Santa Clara,
+ * CA 95054 USA or visit www.sun.com if you need additional information or
+ * have any questions.
+ *
+ */
+
+// Use AbstractRegister as shortcut
+class AbstractRegisterImpl;
+typedef AbstractRegisterImpl* AbstractRegister;
+
+
+// The super class for platform specific registers. Instead of using value objects,
+// registers are implemented as pointers. Subclassing is used so all registers can
+// use the debugging suport below. No virtual functions are used for efficiency.
+// They are canonicalized; i.e., registers are equal if their pointers are equal,
+// and vice versa. A concrete implementation may just map the register onto 'this'.
+
+class AbstractRegisterImpl {
+ protected:
+  int value() const                              { return (int)(intx)this; }
+};
+
+
+//
+// Macros for use in defining Register instances.  We'd like to be
+// able to simply define const instances of the RegisterImpl* for each
+// of the registers needed on a system in a header file.  However many
+// compilers don't handle this very well and end up producing a
+// private definition in every file which includes the header file.
+// Along with the static constructors necessary for initialization it
+// can consume a significant amount of space in the result library.
+//
+// The following macros allow us to declare the instance in a .hpp and
+// produce an enumeration value which has the same number.  Then in a
+// .cpp the the register instance can be defined using the enumeration
+// value.  This avoids the use of static constructors and multiple
+// definitions per .cpp.  In addition #defines for the register can be
+// produced so that the constant registers can be inlined.  These
+// macros should not be used inside other macros, because you may get
+// multiple evaluations of the macros which can give bad results.
+//
+// Here are some example uses and expansions.  Note that the macro
+// invocation is terminated with a ;.
+//
+// CONSTANT_REGISTER_DECLARATION(Register, G0, 0);
+//
+// extern const Register G0 ;
+// enum { G0_RegisterEnumValue = 0 } ;
+//
+// REGISTER_DECLARATION(Register, Gmethod, G5);
+//
+// extern const Register Gmethod ;
+// enum { Gmethod_RegisterEnumValue = G5_RegisterEnumValue } ;
+//
+// REGISTER_DEFINITION(Register, G0);
+//
+// const Register G0 = ( ( Register ) G0_RegisterEnumValue ) ;
+//
+
+#define AS_REGISTER(type,name)         ((type)name##_##type##EnumValue)
+
+#define CONSTANT_REGISTER_DECLARATION(type, name, value) \
+extern const type name;                                  \
+enum { name##_##type##EnumValue = (value) }
+
+#define REGISTER_DECLARATION(type, name, value) \
+extern const type name;                         \
+enum { name##_##type##EnumValue = value##_##type##EnumValue }
+
+#define REGISTER_DEFINITION(type, name) \
+const type name = ((type)name##_##type##EnumValue)
+
+
+
+// Debugging support
+
+inline void assert_different_registers(
+  AbstractRegister a,
+  AbstractRegister b
+) {
+  assert(
+    a != b,
+    "registers must be different"
+  );
+}
+
+
+inline void assert_different_registers(
+  AbstractRegister a,
+  AbstractRegister b,
+  AbstractRegister c
+) {
+  assert(
+    a != b && a != c
+           && b != c,
+    "registers must be different"
+  );
+}
+
+
+inline void assert_different_registers(
+  AbstractRegister a,
+  AbstractRegister b,
+  AbstractRegister c,
+  AbstractRegister d
+) {
+  assert(
+    a != b && a != c && a != d
+           && b != c && b != d
+                     && c != d,
+    "registers must be different"
+  );
+}
+
+
+inline void assert_different_registers(
+  AbstractRegister a,
+  AbstractRegister b,
+  AbstractRegister c,
+  AbstractRegister d,
+  AbstractRegister e
+) {
+  assert(
+    a != b && a != c && a != d && a != e
+           && b != c && b != d && b != e
+                     && c != d && c != e
+                               && d != e,
+    "registers must be different"
+  );
+}
+
+
+inline void assert_different_registers(
+  AbstractRegister a,
+  AbstractRegister b,
+  AbstractRegister c,
+  AbstractRegister d,
+  AbstractRegister e,
+  AbstractRegister f
+) {
+  assert(
+    a != b && a != c && a != d && a != e && a != f
+           && b != c && b != d && b != e && b != f
+                     && c != d && c != e && c != f
+                               && d != e && d != f
+                                         && e != f,
+    "registers must be different"
+  );
+}
+
+
+inline void assert_different_registers(
+  AbstractRegister a,
+  AbstractRegister b,
+  AbstractRegister c,
+  AbstractRegister d,
+  AbstractRegister e,
+  AbstractRegister f,
+  AbstractRegister g
+) {
+  assert(
+    a != b && a != c && a != d && a != e && a != f && a != g
+           && b != c && b != d && b != e && b != f && b != g
+                     && c != d && c != e && c != f && c != g
+                               && d != e && d != f && d != g
+                                         && e != f && e != g
+                                                   && f != g,
+    "registers must be different"
+  );
+}
+
+
+inline void assert_different_registers(
+  AbstractRegister a,
+  AbstractRegister b,
+  AbstractRegister c,
+  AbstractRegister d,
+  AbstractRegister e,
+  AbstractRegister f,
+  AbstractRegister g,
+  AbstractRegister h
+) {
+  assert(
+    a != b && a != c && a != d && a != e && a != f && a != g && a != h
+           && b != c && b != d && b != e && b != f && b != g && b != h
+                     && c != d && c != e && c != f && c != g && c != h
+                               && d != e && d != f && d != g && d != h
+                                         && e != f && e != g && e != h
+                                                   && f != g && f != h
+                                                             && g != h,
+    "registers must be different"
+  );
+}