Mercurial > hg > truffle
diff src/share/vm/memory/genCollectedHeap.cpp @ 4712:e7dead7e90af
7117303: VM uses non-monotonic time source and complains that it is non-monotonic
Summary: Replaces calls to os::javaTimeMillis(), which does not (and cannot) guarantee monotonicity, in GC code to an equivalent expression that uses os::javaTimeNanos(). os::javaTimeNanos is guaranteed monotonically non-decreasing if the underlying platform provides a monotonic time source. Changes in OS files are to make use of the newly defined constants in globalDefinitions.hpp.
Reviewed-by: dholmes, ysr
author | johnc |
---|---|
date | Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:02:05 -0800 |
parents | 3c648b9ad052 |
children | 441e946dc1af |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/src/share/vm/memory/genCollectedHeap.cpp Fri Dec 16 11:40:00 2011 -0800 +++ b/src/share/vm/memory/genCollectedHeap.cpp Mon Dec 19 10:02:05 2011 -0800 @@ -1460,26 +1460,22 @@ }; jlong GenCollectedHeap::millis_since_last_gc() { - jlong now = os::javaTimeMillis(); + // We need a monotonically non-deccreasing time in ms but + // os::javaTimeMillis() does not guarantee monotonicity. + jlong now = os::javaTimeNanos() / NANOSECS_PER_MILLISEC; GenTimeOfLastGCClosure tolgc_cl(now); // iterate over generations getting the oldest // time that a generation was collected generation_iterate(&tolgc_cl, false); tolgc_cl.do_generation(perm_gen()); - // XXX Despite the assert above, since javaTimeMillis() - // doesnot guarantee monotonically increasing return - // values (note, i didn't say "strictly monotonic"), - // we need to guard against getting back a time - // later than now. This should be fixed by basing - // on someting like gethrtime() which guarantees - // monotonicity. Note that cond_wait() is susceptible - // to a similar problem, because its interface is - // based on absolute time in the form of the - // system time's notion of UCT. See also 4506635 - // for yet another problem of similar nature. XXX + + // javaTimeNanos() is guaranteed to be monotonically non-decreasing + // provided the underlying platform provides such a time source + // (and it is bug free). So we still have to guard against getting + // back a time later than 'now'. jlong retVal = now - tolgc_cl.time(); if (retVal < 0) { - NOT_PRODUCT(warning("time warp: %d", retVal);) + NOT_PRODUCT(warning("time warp: "INT64_FORMAT, retVal);) return 0; } return retVal;