Mercurial > hg > truffle
view test/gc/arguments/TestUnrecognizedVMOptionsHandling.java @ 20228:f72d8917322a
8050978: Fix bad field access check in C1 and C2
Summary: JCK8 test vm/constantpool/accessControl/accessControl004/accessControl00402m3/accessControl00402m3.html fails with -Xbatch -Xcomp due to bad field access check in C1 and C2. Fix: In ciField::ciField(), just before the canonical holder is stored into the _holder variable (and which is used by ciField::will_link()) perform an additional access check with the holder declared in the class file. If this check fails, store the declared holder instead and ciField::will_link() will bail out compilation for this field later on. Then, the interpreter will throw an PrivilegedAccessException at runtime.
Reviewed-by: kvn, vlivanov
Contributed-by: andreas.schoesser@sap.com
author | goetz |
---|---|
date | Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:04:01 +0200 |
parents | 6e3634222155 |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
/* * Copyright (c) 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER. * * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as * published by the Free Software Foundation. * * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that * accompanied this code). * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA. * * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any * questions. */ /* * @test TestUnrecognizedVMOptionsHandling * @key gc * @bug 8017611 * @summary Tests handling unrecognized VM options * @library /testlibrary * @run main/othervm TestUnrecognizedVMOptionsHandling */ import com.oracle.java.testlibrary.*; public class TestUnrecognizedVMOptionsHandling { public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception { // The first two JAVA processes are expected to fail, but with a correct VM option suggestion ProcessBuilder pb = ProcessTools.createJavaProcessBuilder( "-XX:+PrintGc", "-version" ); OutputAnalyzer outputWithError = new OutputAnalyzer(pb.start()); outputWithError.shouldContain("Did you mean '(+/-)PrintGC'?"); if (outputWithError.getExitValue() == 0) { throw new RuntimeException("Not expected to get exit value 0"); } pb = ProcessTools.createJavaProcessBuilder( "-XX:MaxiumHeapSize=500m", "-version" ); outputWithError = new OutputAnalyzer(pb.start()); outputWithError.shouldContain("Did you mean 'MaxHeapSize=<value>'?"); if (outputWithError.getExitValue() == 0) { throw new RuntimeException("Not expected to get exit value 0"); } // The last JAVA process should run successfully for the purpose of sanity check pb = ProcessTools.createJavaProcessBuilder( "-XX:+PrintGC", "-version" ); OutputAnalyzer outputWithNoError = new OutputAnalyzer(pb.start()); outputWithNoError.shouldNotContain("Did you mean '(+/-)PrintGC'?"); outputWithNoError.shouldHaveExitValue(0); } }