Mercurial > hg > truffle
annotate src/share/vm/runtime/mutex.cpp @ 17524:89152779163c
Merge with jdk8-b132
| author | Gilles Duboscq <duboscq@ssw.jku.at> |
|---|---|
| date | Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:59:32 +0200 |
| parents | 51c6ce89d4dd |
| children | 52b4284cb496 |
| rev | line source |
|---|---|
| 0 | 1 |
| 2 /* | |
| 17524 | 3 * Copyright (c) 1998, 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
| 0 | 4 * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER. |
| 5 * | |
| 6 * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it | |
| 7 * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as | |
| 8 * published by the Free Software Foundation. | |
| 9 * | |
| 10 * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT | |
| 11 * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or | |
| 12 * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License | |
| 13 * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that | |
| 14 * accompanied this code). | |
| 15 * | |
| 16 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version | |
| 17 * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, | |
| 18 * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA. | |
| 19 * | |
|
1552
c18cbe5936b8
6941466: Oracle rebranding changes for Hotspot repositories
trims
parents:
1490
diff
changeset
|
20 * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA |
|
c18cbe5936b8
6941466: Oracle rebranding changes for Hotspot repositories
trims
parents:
1490
diff
changeset
|
21 * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any |
|
c18cbe5936b8
6941466: Oracle rebranding changes for Hotspot repositories
trims
parents:
1490
diff
changeset
|
22 * questions. |
| 0 | 23 * |
| 24 */ | |
| 25 | |
| 1972 | 26 #include "precompiled.hpp" |
| 27 #include "runtime/mutex.hpp" | |
| 28 #include "runtime/osThread.hpp" | |
|
7180
f34d701e952e
8003935: Simplify the needed includes for using Thread::current()
stefank
parents:
4872
diff
changeset
|
29 #include "runtime/thread.inline.hpp" |
| 1972 | 30 #include "utilities/events.hpp" |
| 31 #ifdef TARGET_OS_FAMILY_linux | |
| 32 # include "mutex_linux.inline.hpp" | |
| 33 #endif | |
| 34 #ifdef TARGET_OS_FAMILY_solaris | |
| 35 # include "mutex_solaris.inline.hpp" | |
| 36 #endif | |
| 37 #ifdef TARGET_OS_FAMILY_windows | |
| 38 # include "mutex_windows.inline.hpp" | |
| 39 #endif | |
| 3960 | 40 #ifdef TARGET_OS_FAMILY_bsd |
| 41 # include "mutex_bsd.inline.hpp" | |
| 42 #endif | |
| 0 | 43 |
| 44 // o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o | |
| 45 // | |
| 46 // Native Monitor-Mutex locking - theory of operations | |
| 47 // | |
| 48 // * Native Monitors are completely unrelated to Java-level monitors, | |
| 49 // although the "back-end" slow-path implementations share a common lineage. | |
| 50 // See objectMonitor:: in synchronizer.cpp. | |
| 51 // Native Monitors do *not* support nesting or recursion but otherwise | |
| 52 // they're basically Hoare-flavor monitors. | |
| 53 // | |
| 54 // * A thread acquires ownership of a Monitor/Mutex by CASing the LockByte | |
| 55 // in the _LockWord from zero to non-zero. Note that the _Owner field | |
| 56 // is advisory and is used only to verify that the thread calling unlock() | |
| 57 // is indeed the last thread to have acquired the lock. | |
| 58 // | |
| 59 // * Contending threads "push" themselves onto the front of the contention | |
| 60 // queue -- called the cxq -- with CAS and then spin/park. | |
| 61 // The _LockWord contains the LockByte as well as the pointer to the head | |
| 62 // of the cxq. Colocating the LockByte with the cxq precludes certain races. | |
| 63 // | |
| 64 // * Using a separately addressable LockByte allows for CAS:MEMBAR or CAS:0 | |
| 65 // idioms. We currently use MEMBAR in the uncontended unlock() path, as | |
| 66 // MEMBAR often has less latency than CAS. If warranted, we could switch to | |
| 67 // a CAS:0 mode, using timers to close the resultant race, as is done | |
| 68 // with Java Monitors in synchronizer.cpp. | |
| 69 // | |
| 70 // See the following for a discussion of the relative cost of atomics (CAS) | |
| 71 // MEMBAR, and ways to eliminate such instructions from the common-case paths: | |
| 72 // -- http://blogs.sun.com/dave/entry/biased_locking_in_hotspot | |
| 73 // -- http://blogs.sun.com/dave/resource/MustangSync.pdf | |
| 74 // -- http://blogs.sun.com/dave/resource/synchronization-public2.pdf | |
| 75 // -- synchronizer.cpp | |
| 76 // | |
| 77 // * Overall goals - desiderata | |
| 78 // 1. Minimize context switching | |
| 79 // 2. Minimize lock migration | |
| 80 // 3. Minimize CPI -- affinity and locality | |
| 81 // 4. Minimize the execution of high-latency instructions such as CAS or MEMBAR | |
| 82 // 5. Minimize outer lock hold times | |
| 83 // 6. Behave gracefully on a loaded system | |
| 84 // | |
| 85 // * Thread flow and list residency: | |
| 86 // | |
| 87 // Contention queue --> EntryList --> OnDeck --> Owner --> !Owner | |
| 88 // [..resident on monitor list..] | |
| 89 // [...........contending..................] | |
| 90 // | |
| 91 // -- The contention queue (cxq) contains recently-arrived threads (RATs). | |
| 92 // Threads on the cxq eventually drain into the EntryList. | |
| 93 // -- Invariant: a thread appears on at most one list -- cxq, EntryList | |
| 94 // or WaitSet -- at any one time. | |
| 95 // -- For a given monitor there can be at most one "OnDeck" thread at any | |
| 96 // given time but if needbe this particular invariant could be relaxed. | |
| 97 // | |
| 98 // * The WaitSet and EntryList linked lists are composed of ParkEvents. | |
| 99 // I use ParkEvent instead of threads as ParkEvents are immortal and | |
| 100 // type-stable, meaning we can safely unpark() a possibly stale | |
| 101 // list element in the unlock()-path. (That's benign). | |
| 102 // | |
| 103 // * Succession policy - providing for progress: | |
| 104 // | |
| 105 // As necessary, the unlock()ing thread identifies, unlinks, and unparks | |
| 106 // an "heir presumptive" tentative successor thread from the EntryList. | |
| 107 // This becomes the so-called "OnDeck" thread, of which there can be only | |
| 108 // one at any given time for a given monitor. The wakee will recontend | |
| 109 // for ownership of monitor. | |
| 110 // | |
| 111 // Succession is provided for by a policy of competitive handoff. | |
| 112 // The exiting thread does _not_ grant or pass ownership to the | |
| 113 // successor thread. (This is also referred to as "handoff" succession"). | |
| 114 // Instead the exiting thread releases ownership and possibly wakes | |
| 115 // a successor, so the successor can (re)compete for ownership of the lock. | |
| 116 // | |
| 117 // Competitive handoff provides excellent overall throughput at the expense | |
| 118 // of short-term fairness. If fairness is a concern then one remedy might | |
| 119 // be to add an AcquireCounter field to the monitor. After a thread acquires | |
| 120 // the lock it will decrement the AcquireCounter field. When the count | |
| 121 // reaches 0 the thread would reset the AcquireCounter variable, abdicate | |
| 122 // the lock directly to some thread on the EntryList, and then move itself to the | |
| 123 // tail of the EntryList. | |
| 124 // | |
| 125 // But in practice most threads engage or otherwise participate in resource | |
| 126 // bounded producer-consumer relationships, so lock domination is not usually | |
| 127 // a practical concern. Recall too, that in general it's easier to construct | |
| 128 // a fair lock from a fast lock, but not vice-versa. | |
| 129 // | |
| 130 // * The cxq can have multiple concurrent "pushers" but only one concurrent | |
| 131 // detaching thread. This mechanism is immune from the ABA corruption. | |
| 132 // More precisely, the CAS-based "push" onto cxq is ABA-oblivious. | |
| 133 // We use OnDeck as a pseudo-lock to enforce the at-most-one detaching | |
| 134 // thread constraint. | |
| 135 // | |
| 136 // * Taken together, the cxq and the EntryList constitute or form a | |
| 137 // single logical queue of threads stalled trying to acquire the lock. | |
| 138 // We use two distinct lists to reduce heat on the list ends. | |
| 139 // Threads in lock() enqueue onto cxq while threads in unlock() will | |
| 140 // dequeue from the EntryList. (c.f. Michael Scott's "2Q" algorithm). | |
| 141 // A key desideratum is to minimize queue & monitor metadata manipulation | |
| 142 // that occurs while holding the "outer" monitor lock -- that is, we want to | |
| 143 // minimize monitor lock holds times. | |
| 144 // | |
| 145 // The EntryList is ordered by the prevailing queue discipline and | |
| 146 // can be organized in any convenient fashion, such as a doubly-linked list or | |
| 147 // a circular doubly-linked list. If we need a priority queue then something akin | |
| 148 // to Solaris' sleepq would work nicely. Viz., | |
| 149 // -- http://agg.eng/ws/on10_nightly/source/usr/src/uts/common/os/sleepq.c. | |
| 150 // -- http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/os/sleepq.c | |
| 151 // Queue discipline is enforced at ::unlock() time, when the unlocking thread | |
| 152 // drains the cxq into the EntryList, and orders or reorders the threads on the | |
| 153 // EntryList accordingly. | |
| 154 // | |
| 155 // Barring "lock barging", this mechanism provides fair cyclic ordering, | |
| 156 // somewhat similar to an elevator-scan. | |
| 157 // | |
| 158 // * OnDeck | |
| 159 // -- For a given monitor there can be at most one OnDeck thread at any given | |
| 160 // instant. The OnDeck thread is contending for the lock, but has been | |
| 161 // unlinked from the EntryList and cxq by some previous unlock() operations. | |
| 162 // Once a thread has been designated the OnDeck thread it will remain so | |
| 163 // until it manages to acquire the lock -- being OnDeck is a stable property. | |
| 164 // -- Threads on the EntryList or cxq are _not allowed to attempt lock acquisition. | |
| 165 // -- OnDeck also serves as an "inner lock" as follows. Threads in unlock() will, after | |
| 166 // having cleared the LockByte and dropped the outer lock, attempt to "trylock" | |
| 167 // OnDeck by CASing the field from null to non-null. If successful, that thread | |
| 168 // is then responsible for progress and succession and can use CAS to detach and | |
| 169 // drain the cxq into the EntryList. By convention, only this thread, the holder of | |
| 170 // the OnDeck inner lock, can manipulate the EntryList or detach and drain the | |
| 171 // RATs on the cxq into the EntryList. This avoids ABA corruption on the cxq as | |
| 172 // we allow multiple concurrent "push" operations but restrict detach concurrency | |
| 173 // to at most one thread. Having selected and detached a successor, the thread then | |
| 174 // changes the OnDeck to refer to that successor, and then unparks the successor. | |
| 175 // That successor will eventually acquire the lock and clear OnDeck. Beware | |
| 176 // that the OnDeck usage as a lock is asymmetric. A thread in unlock() transiently | |
| 177 // "acquires" OnDeck, performs queue manipulations, passes OnDeck to some successor, | |
| 178 // and then the successor eventually "drops" OnDeck. Note that there's never | |
| 179 // any sense of contention on the inner lock, however. Threads never contend | |
| 180 // or wait for the inner lock. | |
| 181 // -- OnDeck provides for futile wakeup throttling a described in section 3.3 of | |
| 182 // See http://www.usenix.org/events/jvm01/full_papers/dice/dice.pdf | |
| 183 // In a sense, OnDeck subsumes the ObjectMonitor _Succ and ObjectWaiter | |
| 184 // TState fields found in Java-level objectMonitors. (See synchronizer.cpp). | |
| 185 // | |
| 186 // * Waiting threads reside on the WaitSet list -- wait() puts | |
| 187 // the caller onto the WaitSet. Notify() or notifyAll() simply | |
| 188 // transfers threads from the WaitSet to either the EntryList or cxq. | |
| 189 // Subsequent unlock() operations will eventually unpark the notifyee. | |
| 190 // Unparking a notifee in notify() proper is inefficient - if we were to do so | |
| 191 // it's likely the notifyee would simply impale itself on the lock held | |
| 192 // by the notifier. | |
| 193 // | |
| 194 // * The mechanism is obstruction-free in that if the holder of the transient | |
| 195 // OnDeck lock in unlock() is preempted or otherwise stalls, other threads | |
| 196 // can still acquire and release the outer lock and continue to make progress. | |
| 197 // At worst, waking of already blocked contending threads may be delayed, | |
| 198 // but nothing worse. (We only use "trylock" operations on the inner OnDeck | |
| 199 // lock). | |
| 200 // | |
| 201 // * Note that thread-local storage must be initialized before a thread | |
| 202 // uses Native monitors or mutexes. The native monitor-mutex subsystem | |
| 203 // depends on Thread::current(). | |
| 204 // | |
| 205 // * The monitor synchronization subsystem avoids the use of native | |
| 206 // synchronization primitives except for the narrow platform-specific | |
| 207 // park-unpark abstraction. See the comments in os_solaris.cpp regarding | |
| 208 // the semantics of park-unpark. Put another way, this monitor implementation | |
| 209 // depends only on atomic operations and park-unpark. The monitor subsystem | |
| 210 // manages all RUNNING->BLOCKED and BLOCKED->READY transitions while the | |
| 211 // underlying OS manages the READY<->RUN transitions. | |
| 212 // | |
| 213 // * The memory consistency model provide by lock()-unlock() is at least as | |
| 214 // strong or stronger than the Java Memory model defined by JSR-133. | |
| 215 // That is, we guarantee at least entry consistency, if not stronger. | |
| 216 // See http://g.oswego.edu/dl/jmm/cookbook.html. | |
| 217 // | |
| 218 // * Thread:: currently contains a set of purpose-specific ParkEvents: | |
| 219 // _MutexEvent, _ParkEvent, etc. A better approach might be to do away with | |
| 220 // the purpose-specific ParkEvents and instead implement a general per-thread | |
| 221 // stack of available ParkEvents which we could provision on-demand. The | |
| 222 // stack acts as a local cache to avoid excessive calls to ParkEvent::Allocate() | |
| 223 // and ::Release(). A thread would simply pop an element from the local stack before it | |
| 224 // enqueued or park()ed. When the contention was over the thread would | |
| 225 // push the no-longer-needed ParkEvent back onto its stack. | |
| 226 // | |
| 227 // * A slightly reduced form of ILock() and IUnlock() have been partially | |
| 228 // model-checked (Murphi) for safety and progress at T=1,2,3 and 4. | |
| 229 // It'd be interesting to see if TLA/TLC could be useful as well. | |
| 230 // | |
| 231 // * Mutex-Monitor is a low-level "leaf" subsystem. That is, the monitor | |
| 232 // code should never call other code in the JVM that might itself need to | |
| 233 // acquire monitors or mutexes. That's true *except* in the case of the | |
| 234 // ThreadBlockInVM state transition wrappers. The ThreadBlockInVM DTOR handles | |
| 235 // mutator reentry (ingress) by checking for a pending safepoint in which case it will | |
| 236 // call SafepointSynchronize::block(), which in turn may call Safepoint_lock->lock(), etc. | |
| 237 // In that particular case a call to lock() for a given Monitor can end up recursively | |
| 238 // calling lock() on another monitor. While distasteful, this is largely benign | |
| 239 // as the calls come from jacket that wraps lock(), and not from deep within lock() itself. | |
| 240 // | |
| 241 // It's unfortunate that native mutexes and thread state transitions were convolved. | |
| 242 // They're really separate concerns and should have remained that way. Melding | |
| 243 // them together was facile -- a bit too facile. The current implementation badly | |
| 244 // conflates the two concerns. | |
| 245 // | |
| 246 // * TODO-FIXME: | |
| 247 // | |
| 248 // -- Add DTRACE probes for contended acquire, contended acquired, contended unlock | |
| 249 // We should also add DTRACE probes in the ParkEvent subsystem for | |
| 250 // Park-entry, Park-exit, and Unpark. | |
| 251 // | |
| 252 // -- We have an excess of mutex-like constructs in the JVM, namely: | |
| 253 // 1. objectMonitors for Java-level synchronization (synchronizer.cpp) | |
| 254 // 2. low-level muxAcquire and muxRelease | |
| 255 // 3. low-level spinAcquire and spinRelease | |
| 256 // 4. native Mutex:: and Monitor:: | |
| 257 // 5. jvm_raw_lock() and _unlock() | |
| 258 // 6. JVMTI raw monitors -- distinct from (5) despite having a confusingly | |
| 259 // similar name. | |
| 260 // | |
| 261 // o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o | |
| 262 | |
| 263 | |
| 264 // CASPTR() uses the canonical argument order that dominates in the literature. | |
| 265 // Our internal cmpxchg_ptr() uses a bastardized ordering to accommodate Sun .il templates. | |
| 266 | |
| 267 #define CASPTR(a,c,s) intptr_t(Atomic::cmpxchg_ptr ((void *)(s),(void *)(a),(void *)(c))) | |
| 268 #define UNS(x) (uintptr_t(x)) | |
| 269 #define TRACE(m) { static volatile int ctr = 0 ; int x = ++ctr ; if ((x & (x-1))==0) { ::printf ("%d:%s\n", x, #m); ::fflush(stdout); }} | |
| 270 | |
| 271 // Simplistic low-quality Marsaglia SHIFT-XOR RNG. | |
| 272 // Bijective except for the trailing mask operation. | |
| 273 // Useful for spin loops as the compiler can't optimize it away. | |
| 274 | |
| 275 static inline jint MarsagliaXORV (jint x) { | |
| 276 if (x == 0) x = 1|os::random() ; | |
| 277 x ^= x << 6; | |
| 278 x ^= ((unsigned)x) >> 21; | |
| 279 x ^= x << 7 ; | |
| 280 return x & 0x7FFFFFFF ; | |
| 281 } | |
| 282 | |
| 283 static int Stall (int its) { | |
| 284 static volatile jint rv = 1 ; | |
| 285 volatile int OnFrame = 0 ; | |
| 286 jint v = rv ^ UNS(OnFrame) ; | |
| 287 while (--its >= 0) { | |
| 288 v = MarsagliaXORV (v) ; | |
| 289 } | |
| 290 // Make this impossible for the compiler to optimize away, | |
| 291 // but (mostly) avoid W coherency sharing on MP systems. | |
| 292 if (v == 0x12345) rv = v ; | |
| 293 return v ; | |
| 294 } | |
| 295 | |
| 296 int Monitor::TryLock () { | |
| 297 intptr_t v = _LockWord.FullWord ; | |
| 298 for (;;) { | |
| 299 if ((v & _LBIT) != 0) return 0 ; | |
| 300 const intptr_t u = CASPTR (&_LockWord, v, v|_LBIT) ; | |
| 301 if (v == u) return 1 ; | |
| 302 v = u ; | |
| 303 } | |
| 304 } | |
| 305 | |
| 306 int Monitor::TryFast () { | |
| 307 // Optimistic fast-path form ... | |
| 308 // Fast-path attempt for the common uncontended case. | |
| 309 // Avoid RTS->RTO $ coherence upgrade on typical SMP systems. | |
| 310 intptr_t v = CASPTR (&_LockWord, 0, _LBIT) ; // agro ... | |
| 311 if (v == 0) return 1 ; | |
| 312 | |
| 313 for (;;) { | |
| 314 if ((v & _LBIT) != 0) return 0 ; | |
| 315 const intptr_t u = CASPTR (&_LockWord, v, v|_LBIT) ; | |
| 316 if (v == u) return 1 ; | |
| 317 v = u ; | |
| 318 } | |
| 319 } | |
| 320 | |
| 321 int Monitor::ILocked () { | |
| 322 const intptr_t w = _LockWord.FullWord & 0xFF ; | |
| 323 assert (w == 0 || w == _LBIT, "invariant") ; | |
| 324 return w == _LBIT ; | |
| 325 } | |
| 326 | |
| 327 // Polite TATAS spinlock with exponential backoff - bounded spin. | |
| 328 // Ideally we'd use processor cycles, time or vtime to control | |
| 329 // the loop, but we currently use iterations. | |
| 330 // All the constants within were derived empirically but work over | |
| 331 // over the spectrum of J2SE reference platforms. | |
| 332 // On Niagara-class systems the back-off is unnecessary but | |
| 333 // is relatively harmless. (At worst it'll slightly retard | |
| 334 // acquisition times). The back-off is critical for older SMP systems | |
| 335 // where constant fetching of the LockWord would otherwise impair | |
| 336 // scalability. | |
| 337 // | |
| 338 // Clamp spinning at approximately 1/2 of a context-switch round-trip. | |
| 339 // See synchronizer.cpp for details and rationale. | |
| 340 | |
| 341 int Monitor::TrySpin (Thread * const Self) { | |
| 342 if (TryLock()) return 1 ; | |
| 343 if (!os::is_MP()) return 0 ; | |
| 344 | |
| 345 int Probes = 0 ; | |
| 346 int Delay = 0 ; | |
| 347 int Steps = 0 ; | |
| 348 int SpinMax = NativeMonitorSpinLimit ; | |
| 349 int flgs = NativeMonitorFlags ; | |
| 350 for (;;) { | |
| 351 intptr_t v = _LockWord.FullWord; | |
| 352 if ((v & _LBIT) == 0) { | |
| 353 if (CASPTR (&_LockWord, v, v|_LBIT) == v) { | |
| 354 return 1 ; | |
| 355 } | |
| 356 continue ; | |
| 357 } | |
| 358 | |
| 359 if ((flgs & 8) == 0) { | |
| 360 SpinPause () ; | |
| 361 } | |
| 362 | |
| 363 // Periodically increase Delay -- variable Delay form | |
| 364 // conceptually: delay *= 1 + 1/Exponent | |
| 365 ++ Probes; | |
| 366 if (Probes > SpinMax) return 0 ; | |
| 367 | |
| 368 if ((Probes & 0x7) == 0) { | |
| 369 Delay = ((Delay << 1)|1) & 0x7FF ; | |
| 370 // CONSIDER: Delay += 1 + (Delay/4); Delay &= 0x7FF ; | |
| 371 } | |
| 372 | |
| 373 if (flgs & 2) continue ; | |
| 374 | |
| 375 // Consider checking _owner's schedctl state, if OFFPROC abort spin. | |
| 376 // If the owner is OFFPROC then it's unlike that the lock will be dropped | |
| 377 // in a timely fashion, which suggests that spinning would not be fruitful | |
| 378 // or profitable. | |
| 379 | |
| 380 // Stall for "Delay" time units - iterations in the current implementation. | |
| 381 // Avoid generating coherency traffic while stalled. | |
| 382 // Possible ways to delay: | |
| 383 // PAUSE, SLEEP, MEMBAR #sync, MEMBAR #halt, | |
| 384 // wr %g0,%asi, gethrtime, rdstick, rdtick, rdtsc, etc. ... | |
| 385 // Note that on Niagara-class systems we want to minimize STs in the | |
| 386 // spin loop. N1 and brethren write-around the L1$ over the xbar into the L2$. | |
| 387 // Furthermore, they don't have a W$ like traditional SPARC processors. | |
| 388 // We currently use a Marsaglia Shift-Xor RNG loop. | |
| 389 Steps += Delay ; | |
| 390 if (Self != NULL) { | |
| 391 jint rv = Self->rng[0] ; | |
| 392 for (int k = Delay ; --k >= 0; ) { | |
| 393 rv = MarsagliaXORV (rv) ; | |
| 394 if ((flgs & 4) == 0 && SafepointSynchronize::do_call_back()) return 0 ; | |
| 395 } | |
| 396 Self->rng[0] = rv ; | |
| 397 } else { | |
| 398 Stall (Delay) ; | |
| 399 } | |
| 400 } | |
| 401 } | |
| 402 | |
| 403 static int ParkCommon (ParkEvent * ev, jlong timo) { | |
| 404 // Diagnostic support - periodically unwedge blocked threads | |
| 405 intx nmt = NativeMonitorTimeout ; | |
| 406 if (nmt > 0 && (nmt < timo || timo <= 0)) { | |
| 407 timo = nmt ; | |
| 408 } | |
| 409 int err = OS_OK ; | |
| 410 if (0 == timo) { | |
| 411 ev->park() ; | |
| 412 } else { | |
| 413 err = ev->park(timo) ; | |
| 414 } | |
| 415 return err ; | |
| 416 } | |
| 417 | |
| 418 inline int Monitor::AcquireOrPush (ParkEvent * ESelf) { | |
| 419 intptr_t v = _LockWord.FullWord ; | |
| 420 for (;;) { | |
| 421 if ((v & _LBIT) == 0) { | |
| 422 const intptr_t u = CASPTR (&_LockWord, v, v|_LBIT) ; | |
| 423 if (u == v) return 1 ; // indicate acquired | |
| 424 v = u ; | |
| 425 } else { | |
| 426 // Anticipate success ... | |
| 427 ESelf->ListNext = (ParkEvent *) (v & ~_LBIT) ; | |
| 428 const intptr_t u = CASPTR (&_LockWord, v, intptr_t(ESelf)|_LBIT) ; | |
| 429 if (u == v) return 0 ; // indicate pushed onto cxq | |
| 430 v = u ; | |
| 431 } | |
| 432 // Interference - LockWord change - just retry | |
| 433 } | |
| 434 } | |
| 435 | |
| 436 // ILock and IWait are the lowest level primitive internal blocking | |
| 437 // synchronization functions. The callers of IWait and ILock must have | |
| 438 // performed any needed state transitions beforehand. | |
| 439 // IWait and ILock may directly call park() without any concern for thread state. | |
| 440 // Note that ILock and IWait do *not* access _owner. | |
| 441 // _owner is a higher-level logical concept. | |
| 442 | |
| 443 void Monitor::ILock (Thread * Self) { | |
| 444 assert (_OnDeck != Self->_MutexEvent, "invariant") ; | |
| 445 | |
| 446 if (TryFast()) { | |
| 447 Exeunt: | |
| 448 assert (ILocked(), "invariant") ; | |
| 449 return ; | |
| 450 } | |
| 451 | |
| 452 ParkEvent * const ESelf = Self->_MutexEvent ; | |
| 453 assert (_OnDeck != ESelf, "invariant") ; | |
| 454 | |
| 455 // As an optimization, spinners could conditionally try to set ONDECK to _LBIT | |
| 456 // Synchronizer.cpp uses a similar optimization. | |
| 457 if (TrySpin (Self)) goto Exeunt ; | |
| 458 | |
| 459 // Slow-path - the lock is contended. | |
| 460 // Either Enqueue Self on cxq or acquire the outer lock. | |
| 461 // LockWord encoding = (cxq,LOCKBYTE) | |
| 462 ESelf->reset() ; | |
| 463 OrderAccess::fence() ; | |
| 464 | |
| 465 // Optional optimization ... try barging on the inner lock | |
| 466 if ((NativeMonitorFlags & 32) && CASPTR (&_OnDeck, NULL, UNS(Self)) == 0) { | |
| 467 goto OnDeck_LOOP ; | |
| 468 } | |
| 469 | |
| 470 if (AcquireOrPush (ESelf)) goto Exeunt ; | |
| 471 | |
| 472 // At any given time there is at most one ondeck thread. | |
| 473 // ondeck implies not resident on cxq and not resident on EntryList | |
| 474 // Only the OnDeck thread can try to acquire -- contended for -- the lock. | |
| 475 // CONSIDER: use Self->OnDeck instead of m->OnDeck. | |
| 476 // Deschedule Self so that others may run. | |
| 477 while (_OnDeck != ESelf) { | |
| 478 ParkCommon (ESelf, 0) ; | |
| 479 } | |
| 480 | |
| 481 // Self is now in the ONDECK position and will remain so until it | |
| 482 // manages to acquire the lock. | |
| 483 OnDeck_LOOP: | |
| 484 for (;;) { | |
| 485 assert (_OnDeck == ESelf, "invariant") ; | |
| 486 if (TrySpin (Self)) break ; | |
| 487 // CONSIDER: if ESelf->TryPark() && TryLock() break ... | |
| 488 // It's probably wise to spin only if we *actually* blocked | |
| 489 // CONSIDER: check the lockbyte, if it remains set then | |
| 490 // preemptively drain the cxq into the EntryList. | |
| 491 // The best place and time to perform queue operations -- lock metadata -- | |
| 492 // is _before having acquired the outer lock, while waiting for the lock to drop. | |
| 493 ParkCommon (ESelf, 0) ; | |
| 494 } | |
| 495 | |
| 496 assert (_OnDeck == ESelf, "invariant") ; | |
| 497 _OnDeck = NULL ; | |
| 498 | |
| 499 // Note that we current drop the inner lock (clear OnDeck) in the slow-path | |
| 14909 | 500 // epilog immediately after having acquired the outer lock. |
| 0 | 501 // But instead we could consider the following optimizations: |
| 502 // A. Shift or defer dropping the inner lock until the subsequent IUnlock() operation. | |
| 503 // This might avoid potential reacquisition of the inner lock in IUlock(). | |
| 504 // B. While still holding the inner lock, attempt to opportunistically select | |
| 505 // and unlink the next ONDECK thread from the EntryList. | |
| 506 // If successful, set ONDECK to refer to that thread, otherwise clear ONDECK. | |
| 507 // It's critical that the select-and-unlink operation run in constant-time as | |
| 508 // it executes when holding the outer lock and may artificially increase the | |
| 509 // effective length of the critical section. | |
| 510 // Note that (A) and (B) are tantamount to succession by direct handoff for | |
| 511 // the inner lock. | |
| 512 goto Exeunt ; | |
| 513 } | |
| 514 | |
| 515 void Monitor::IUnlock (bool RelaxAssert) { | |
| 516 assert (ILocked(), "invariant") ; | |
|
4740
eccc4b1f8945
7050298: ARM: SIGSEGV in JNIHandleBlock::allocate_handle
vladidan
parents:
3960
diff
changeset
|
517 // Conceptually we need a MEMBAR #storestore|#loadstore barrier or fence immediately |
|
eccc4b1f8945
7050298: ARM: SIGSEGV in JNIHandleBlock::allocate_handle
vladidan
parents:
3960
diff
changeset
|
518 // before the store that releases the lock. Crucially, all the stores and loads in the |
|
eccc4b1f8945
7050298: ARM: SIGSEGV in JNIHandleBlock::allocate_handle
vladidan
parents:
3960
diff
changeset
|
519 // critical section must be globally visible before the store of 0 into the lock-word |
|
eccc4b1f8945
7050298: ARM: SIGSEGV in JNIHandleBlock::allocate_handle
vladidan
parents:
3960
diff
changeset
|
520 // that releases the lock becomes globally visible. That is, memory accesses in the |
|
eccc4b1f8945
7050298: ARM: SIGSEGV in JNIHandleBlock::allocate_handle
vladidan
parents:
3960
diff
changeset
|
521 // critical section should not be allowed to bypass or overtake the following ST that |
|
eccc4b1f8945
7050298: ARM: SIGSEGV in JNIHandleBlock::allocate_handle
vladidan
parents:
3960
diff
changeset
|
522 // releases the lock. As such, to prevent accesses within the critical section |
|
eccc4b1f8945
7050298: ARM: SIGSEGV in JNIHandleBlock::allocate_handle
vladidan
parents:
3960
diff
changeset
|
523 // from "leaking" out, we need a release fence between the critical section and the |
|
eccc4b1f8945
7050298: ARM: SIGSEGV in JNIHandleBlock::allocate_handle
vladidan
parents:
3960
diff
changeset
|
524 // store that releases the lock. In practice that release barrier is elided on |
|
eccc4b1f8945
7050298: ARM: SIGSEGV in JNIHandleBlock::allocate_handle
vladidan
parents:
3960
diff
changeset
|
525 // platforms with strong memory models such as TSO. |
|
eccc4b1f8945
7050298: ARM: SIGSEGV in JNIHandleBlock::allocate_handle
vladidan
parents:
3960
diff
changeset
|
526 // |
|
eccc4b1f8945
7050298: ARM: SIGSEGV in JNIHandleBlock::allocate_handle
vladidan
parents:
3960
diff
changeset
|
527 // Note that the OrderAccess::storeload() fence that appears after unlock store |
|
eccc4b1f8945
7050298: ARM: SIGSEGV in JNIHandleBlock::allocate_handle
vladidan
parents:
3960
diff
changeset
|
528 // provides for progress conditions and succession and is _not related to exclusion |
|
eccc4b1f8945
7050298: ARM: SIGSEGV in JNIHandleBlock::allocate_handle
vladidan
parents:
3960
diff
changeset
|
529 // safety or lock release consistency. |
|
eccc4b1f8945
7050298: ARM: SIGSEGV in JNIHandleBlock::allocate_handle
vladidan
parents:
3960
diff
changeset
|
530 OrderAccess::release_store(&_LockWord.Bytes[_LSBINDEX], 0); // drop outer lock |
|
eccc4b1f8945
7050298: ARM: SIGSEGV in JNIHandleBlock::allocate_handle
vladidan
parents:
3960
diff
changeset
|
531 |
| 0 | 532 OrderAccess::storeload (); |
| 533 ParkEvent * const w = _OnDeck ; | |
| 534 assert (RelaxAssert || w != Thread::current()->_MutexEvent, "invariant") ; | |
| 535 if (w != NULL) { | |
| 536 // Either we have a valid ondeck thread or ondeck is transiently "locked" | |
| 537 // by some exiting thread as it arranges for succession. The LSBit of | |
| 538 // OnDeck allows us to discriminate two cases. If the latter, the | |
| 539 // responsibility for progress and succession lies with that other thread. | |
| 540 // For good performance, we also depend on the fact that redundant unpark() | |
| 541 // operations are cheap. That is, repeated Unpark()ing of the ONDECK thread | |
| 542 // is inexpensive. This approach provides implicit futile wakeup throttling. | |
| 543 // Note that the referent "w" might be stale with respect to the lock. | |
| 544 // In that case the following unpark() is harmless and the worst that'll happen | |
| 545 // is a spurious return from a park() operation. Critically, if "w" _is stale, | |
| 546 // then progress is known to have occurred as that means the thread associated | |
| 547 // with "w" acquired the lock. In that case this thread need take no further | |
| 548 // action to guarantee progress. | |
| 549 if ((UNS(w) & _LBIT) == 0) w->unpark() ; | |
| 550 return ; | |
| 551 } | |
| 552 | |
| 553 intptr_t cxq = _LockWord.FullWord ; | |
| 554 if (((cxq & ~_LBIT)|UNS(_EntryList)) == 0) { | |
| 555 return ; // normal fast-path exit - cxq and EntryList both empty | |
| 556 } | |
| 557 if (cxq & _LBIT) { | |
| 558 // Optional optimization ... | |
| 559 // Some other thread acquired the lock in the window since this | |
| 560 // thread released it. Succession is now that thread's responsibility. | |
| 561 return ; | |
| 562 } | |
| 563 | |
| 564 Succession: | |
| 565 // Slow-path exit - this thread must ensure succession and progress. | |
| 566 // OnDeck serves as lock to protect cxq and EntryList. | |
| 567 // Only the holder of OnDeck can manipulate EntryList or detach the RATs from cxq. | |
| 568 // Avoid ABA - allow multiple concurrent producers (enqueue via push-CAS) | |
| 569 // but only one concurrent consumer (detacher of RATs). | |
| 570 // Consider protecting this critical section with schedctl on Solaris. | |
| 571 // Unlike a normal lock, however, the exiting thread "locks" OnDeck, | |
| 572 // picks a successor and marks that thread as OnDeck. That successor | |
| 573 // thread will then clear OnDeck once it eventually acquires the outer lock. | |
| 574 if (CASPTR (&_OnDeck, NULL, _LBIT) != UNS(NULL)) { | |
| 575 return ; | |
| 576 } | |
| 577 | |
| 578 ParkEvent * List = _EntryList ; | |
| 579 if (List != NULL) { | |
| 580 // Transfer the head of the EntryList to the OnDeck position. | |
| 581 // Once OnDeck, a thread stays OnDeck until it acquires the lock. | |
| 582 // For a given lock there is at most OnDeck thread at any one instant. | |
| 583 WakeOne: | |
| 584 assert (List == _EntryList, "invariant") ; | |
| 585 ParkEvent * const w = List ; | |
| 586 assert (RelaxAssert || w != Thread::current()->_MutexEvent, "invariant") ; | |
| 587 _EntryList = w->ListNext ; | |
| 588 // as a diagnostic measure consider setting w->_ListNext = BAD | |
| 589 assert (UNS(_OnDeck) == _LBIT, "invariant") ; | |
| 590 _OnDeck = w ; // pass OnDeck to w. | |
| 591 // w will clear OnDeck once it acquires the outer lock | |
| 592 | |
| 593 // Another optional optimization ... | |
| 594 // For heavily contended locks it's not uncommon that some other | |
| 595 // thread acquired the lock while this thread was arranging succession. | |
| 596 // Try to defer the unpark() operation - Delegate the responsibility | |
| 597 // for unpark()ing the OnDeck thread to the current or subsequent owners | |
| 598 // That is, the new owner is responsible for unparking the OnDeck thread. | |
| 599 OrderAccess::storeload() ; | |
| 600 cxq = _LockWord.FullWord ; | |
| 601 if (cxq & _LBIT) return ; | |
| 602 | |
| 603 w->unpark() ; | |
| 604 return ; | |
| 605 } | |
| 606 | |
| 607 cxq = _LockWord.FullWord ; | |
| 608 if ((cxq & ~_LBIT) != 0) { | |
| 609 // The EntryList is empty but the cxq is populated. | |
| 610 // drain RATs from cxq into EntryList | |
| 611 // Detach RATs segment with CAS and then merge into EntryList | |
| 612 for (;;) { | |
| 613 // optional optimization - if locked, the owner is responsible for succession | |
| 614 if (cxq & _LBIT) goto Punt ; | |
| 615 const intptr_t vfy = CASPTR (&_LockWord, cxq, cxq & _LBIT) ; | |
| 616 if (vfy == cxq) break ; | |
| 617 cxq = vfy ; | |
| 618 // Interference - LockWord changed - Just retry | |
| 619 // We can see concurrent interference from contending threads | |
| 620 // pushing themselves onto the cxq or from lock-unlock operations. | |
| 621 // From the perspective of this thread, EntryList is stable and | |
| 622 // the cxq is prepend-only -- the head is volatile but the interior | |
| 623 // of the cxq is stable. In theory if we encounter interference from threads | |
| 624 // pushing onto cxq we could simply break off the original cxq suffix and | |
| 625 // move that segment to the EntryList, avoiding a 2nd or multiple CAS attempts | |
| 626 // on the high-traffic LockWord variable. For instance lets say the cxq is "ABCD" | |
| 627 // when we first fetch cxq above. Between the fetch -- where we observed "A" | |
| 628 // -- and CAS -- where we attempt to CAS null over A -- "PQR" arrive, | |
| 629 // yielding cxq = "PQRABCD". In this case we could simply set A.ListNext | |
| 630 // null, leaving cxq = "PQRA" and transfer the "BCD" segment to the EntryList. | |
| 631 // Note too, that it's safe for this thread to traverse the cxq | |
| 632 // without taking any special concurrency precautions. | |
| 633 } | |
| 634 | |
| 635 // We don't currently reorder the cxq segment as we move it onto | |
| 636 // the EntryList, but it might make sense to reverse the order | |
| 637 // or perhaps sort by thread priority. See the comments in | |
| 638 // synchronizer.cpp objectMonitor::exit(). | |
| 639 assert (_EntryList == NULL, "invariant") ; | |
| 640 _EntryList = List = (ParkEvent *)(cxq & ~_LBIT) ; | |
| 641 assert (List != NULL, "invariant") ; | |
| 642 goto WakeOne ; | |
| 643 } | |
| 644 | |
| 645 // cxq|EntryList is empty. | |
| 646 // w == NULL implies that cxq|EntryList == NULL in the past. | |
| 647 // Possible race - rare inopportune interleaving. | |
| 648 // A thread could have added itself to cxq since this thread previously checked. | |
| 649 // Detect and recover by refetching cxq. | |
| 650 Punt: | |
| 651 assert (UNS(_OnDeck) == _LBIT, "invariant") ; | |
| 652 _OnDeck = NULL ; // Release inner lock. | |
| 653 OrderAccess::storeload(); // Dekker duality - pivot point | |
| 654 | |
| 655 // Resample LockWord/cxq to recover from possible race. | |
| 656 // For instance, while this thread T1 held OnDeck, some other thread T2 might | |
| 657 // acquire the outer lock. Another thread T3 might try to acquire the outer | |
| 658 // lock, but encounter contention and enqueue itself on cxq. T2 then drops the | |
| 659 // outer lock, but skips succession as this thread T1 still holds OnDeck. | |
| 660 // T1 is and remains responsible for ensuring succession of T3. | |
| 661 // | |
| 662 // Note that we don't need to recheck EntryList, just cxq. | |
| 663 // If threads moved onto EntryList since we dropped OnDeck | |
| 664 // that implies some other thread forced succession. | |
| 665 cxq = _LockWord.FullWord ; | |
| 666 if ((cxq & ~_LBIT) != 0 && (cxq & _LBIT) == 0) { | |
| 667 goto Succession ; // potential race -- re-run succession | |
| 668 } | |
| 669 return ; | |
| 670 } | |
| 671 | |
| 672 bool Monitor::notify() { | |
| 673 assert (_owner == Thread::current(), "invariant") ; | |
| 674 assert (ILocked(), "invariant") ; | |
| 675 if (_WaitSet == NULL) return true ; | |
| 676 NotifyCount ++ ; | |
| 677 | |
| 678 // Transfer one thread from the WaitSet to the EntryList or cxq. | |
| 679 // Currently we just unlink the head of the WaitSet and prepend to the cxq. | |
| 680 // And of course we could just unlink it and unpark it, too, but | |
| 681 // in that case it'd likely impale itself on the reentry. | |
| 682 Thread::muxAcquire (_WaitLock, "notify:WaitLock") ; | |
| 683 ParkEvent * nfy = _WaitSet ; | |
| 684 if (nfy != NULL) { // DCL idiom | |
| 685 _WaitSet = nfy->ListNext ; | |
| 686 assert (nfy->Notified == 0, "invariant") ; | |
| 687 // push nfy onto the cxq | |
| 688 for (;;) { | |
| 689 const intptr_t v = _LockWord.FullWord ; | |
| 690 assert ((v & 0xFF) == _LBIT, "invariant") ; | |
| 691 nfy->ListNext = (ParkEvent *)(v & ~_LBIT); | |
| 692 if (CASPTR (&_LockWord, v, UNS(nfy)|_LBIT) == v) break; | |
| 693 // interference - _LockWord changed -- just retry | |
| 694 } | |
| 695 // Note that setting Notified before pushing nfy onto the cxq is | |
| 696 // also legal and safe, but the safety properties are much more | |
| 697 // subtle, so for the sake of code stewardship ... | |
| 698 OrderAccess::fence() ; | |
| 699 nfy->Notified = 1; | |
| 700 } | |
| 701 Thread::muxRelease (_WaitLock) ; | |
| 702 if (nfy != NULL && (NativeMonitorFlags & 16)) { | |
| 703 // Experimental code ... light up the wakee in the hope that this thread (the owner) | |
| 704 // will drop the lock just about the time the wakee comes ONPROC. | |
| 705 nfy->unpark() ; | |
| 706 } | |
| 707 assert (ILocked(), "invariant") ; | |
| 708 return true ; | |
| 709 } | |
| 710 | |
| 711 // Currently notifyAll() transfers the waiters one-at-a-time from the waitset | |
| 712 // to the cxq. This could be done more efficiently with a single bulk en-mass transfer, | |
| 713 // but in practice notifyAll() for large #s of threads is rare and not time-critical. | |
| 714 // Beware too, that we invert the order of the waiters. Lets say that the | |
| 715 // waitset is "ABCD" and the cxq is "XYZ". After a notifyAll() the waitset | |
| 716 // will be empty and the cxq will be "DCBAXYZ". This is benign, of course. | |
| 717 | |
| 718 bool Monitor::notify_all() { | |
| 719 assert (_owner == Thread::current(), "invariant") ; | |
| 720 assert (ILocked(), "invariant") ; | |
| 721 while (_WaitSet != NULL) notify() ; | |
| 722 return true ; | |
| 723 } | |
| 724 | |
| 725 int Monitor::IWait (Thread * Self, jlong timo) { | |
| 726 assert (ILocked(), "invariant") ; | |
| 727 | |
| 728 // Phases: | |
| 729 // 1. Enqueue Self on WaitSet - currently prepend | |
| 730 // 2. unlock - drop the outer lock | |
| 731 // 3. wait for either notification or timeout | |
| 732 // 4. lock - reentry - reacquire the outer lock | |
| 733 | |
| 734 ParkEvent * const ESelf = Self->_MutexEvent ; | |
| 735 ESelf->Notified = 0 ; | |
| 736 ESelf->reset() ; | |
| 737 OrderAccess::fence() ; | |
| 738 | |
| 739 // Add Self to WaitSet | |
| 740 // Ideally only the holder of the outer lock would manipulate the WaitSet - | |
| 741 // That is, the outer lock would implicitly protect the WaitSet. | |
| 742 // But if a thread in wait() encounters a timeout it will need to dequeue itself | |
| 743 // from the WaitSet _before it becomes the owner of the lock. We need to dequeue | |
| 744 // as the ParkEvent -- which serves as a proxy for the thread -- can't reside | |
| 745 // on both the WaitSet and the EntryList|cxq at the same time.. That is, a thread | |
| 746 // on the WaitSet can't be allowed to compete for the lock until it has managed to | |
| 747 // unlink its ParkEvent from WaitSet. Thus the need for WaitLock. | |
| 748 // Contention on the WaitLock is minimal. | |
| 749 // | |
| 750 // Another viable approach would be add another ParkEvent, "WaitEvent" to the | |
| 751 // thread class. The WaitSet would be composed of WaitEvents. Only the | |
| 752 // owner of the outer lock would manipulate the WaitSet. A thread in wait() | |
| 753 // could then compete for the outer lock, and then, if necessary, unlink itself | |
| 754 // from the WaitSet only after having acquired the outer lock. More precisely, | |
| 755 // there would be no WaitLock. A thread in in wait() would enqueue its WaitEvent | |
| 756 // on the WaitSet; release the outer lock; wait for either notification or timeout; | |
| 757 // reacquire the inner lock; and then, if needed, unlink itself from the WaitSet. | |
| 758 // | |
| 759 // Alternatively, a 2nd set of list link fields in the ParkEvent might suffice. | |
| 760 // One set would be for the WaitSet and one for the EntryList. | |
| 761 // We could also deconstruct the ParkEvent into a "pure" event and add a | |
| 762 // new immortal/TSM "ListElement" class that referred to ParkEvents. | |
| 763 // In that case we could have one ListElement on the WaitSet and another | |
| 764 // on the EntryList, with both referring to the same pure Event. | |
| 765 | |
| 766 Thread::muxAcquire (_WaitLock, "wait:WaitLock:Add") ; | |
| 767 ESelf->ListNext = _WaitSet ; | |
| 768 _WaitSet = ESelf ; | |
| 769 Thread::muxRelease (_WaitLock) ; | |
| 770 | |
| 771 // Release the outer lock | |
| 772 // We call IUnlock (RelaxAssert=true) as a thread T1 might | |
| 773 // enqueue itself on the WaitSet, call IUnlock(), drop the lock, | |
| 774 // and then stall before it can attempt to wake a successor. | |
| 775 // Some other thread T2 acquires the lock, and calls notify(), moving | |
| 776 // T1 from the WaitSet to the cxq. T2 then drops the lock. T1 resumes, | |
| 777 // and then finds *itself* on the cxq. During the course of a normal | |
| 778 // IUnlock() call a thread should _never find itself on the EntryList | |
| 779 // or cxq, but in the case of wait() it's possible. | |
| 780 // See synchronizer.cpp objectMonitor::wait(). | |
| 781 IUnlock (true) ; | |
| 782 | |
| 783 // Wait for either notification or timeout | |
| 784 // Beware that in some circumstances we might propagate | |
| 785 // spurious wakeups back to the caller. | |
| 786 | |
| 787 for (;;) { | |
| 788 if (ESelf->Notified) break ; | |
| 789 int err = ParkCommon (ESelf, timo) ; | |
| 790 if (err == OS_TIMEOUT || (NativeMonitorFlags & 1)) break ; | |
| 791 } | |
| 792 | |
| 793 // Prepare for reentry - if necessary, remove ESelf from WaitSet | |
| 794 // ESelf can be: | |
| 795 // 1. Still on the WaitSet. This can happen if we exited the loop by timeout. | |
| 796 // 2. On the cxq or EntryList | |
| 797 // 3. Not resident on cxq, EntryList or WaitSet, but in the OnDeck position. | |
| 798 | |
| 799 OrderAccess::fence() ; | |
| 800 int WasOnWaitSet = 0 ; | |
| 801 if (ESelf->Notified == 0) { | |
| 802 Thread::muxAcquire (_WaitLock, "wait:WaitLock:remove") ; | |
| 803 if (ESelf->Notified == 0) { // DCL idiom | |
| 804 assert (_OnDeck != ESelf, "invariant") ; // can't be both OnDeck and on WaitSet | |
| 805 // ESelf is resident on the WaitSet -- unlink it. | |
| 806 // A doubly-linked list would be better here so we can unlink in constant-time. | |
| 807 // We have to unlink before we potentially recontend as ESelf might otherwise | |
| 808 // end up on the cxq|EntryList -- it can't be on two lists at once. | |
| 809 ParkEvent * p = _WaitSet ; | |
| 810 ParkEvent * q = NULL ; // classic q chases p | |
| 811 while (p != NULL && p != ESelf) { | |
| 812 q = p ; | |
| 813 p = p->ListNext ; | |
| 814 } | |
| 815 assert (p == ESelf, "invariant") ; | |
| 816 if (p == _WaitSet) { // found at head | |
| 817 assert (q == NULL, "invariant") ; | |
| 818 _WaitSet = p->ListNext ; | |
| 819 } else { // found in interior | |
| 820 assert (q->ListNext == p, "invariant") ; | |
| 821 q->ListNext = p->ListNext ; | |
| 822 } | |
| 823 WasOnWaitSet = 1 ; // We were *not* notified but instead encountered timeout | |
| 824 } | |
| 825 Thread::muxRelease (_WaitLock) ; | |
| 826 } | |
| 827 | |
| 828 // Reentry phase - reacquire the lock | |
| 829 if (WasOnWaitSet) { | |
| 830 // ESelf was previously on the WaitSet but we just unlinked it above | |
| 831 // because of a timeout. ESelf is not resident on any list and is not OnDeck | |
| 832 assert (_OnDeck != ESelf, "invariant") ; | |
| 833 ILock (Self) ; | |
| 834 } else { | |
| 835 // A prior notify() operation moved ESelf from the WaitSet to the cxq. | |
| 836 // ESelf is now on the cxq, EntryList or at the OnDeck position. | |
| 837 // The following fragment is extracted from Monitor::ILock() | |
| 838 for (;;) { | |
| 839 if (_OnDeck == ESelf && TrySpin(Self)) break ; | |
| 840 ParkCommon (ESelf, 0) ; | |
| 841 } | |
| 842 assert (_OnDeck == ESelf, "invariant") ; | |
| 843 _OnDeck = NULL ; | |
| 844 } | |
| 845 | |
| 846 assert (ILocked(), "invariant") ; | |
| 847 return WasOnWaitSet != 0 ; // return true IFF timeout | |
| 848 } | |
| 849 | |
| 850 | |
| 851 // ON THE VMTHREAD SNEAKING PAST HELD LOCKS: | |
| 852 // In particular, there are certain types of global lock that may be held | |
| 853 // by a Java thread while it is blocked at a safepoint but before it has | |
| 854 // written the _owner field. These locks may be sneakily acquired by the | |
| 855 // VM thread during a safepoint to avoid deadlocks. Alternatively, one should | |
| 856 // identify all such locks, and ensure that Java threads never block at | |
| 857 // safepoints while holding them (_no_safepoint_check_flag). While it | |
| 858 // seems as though this could increase the time to reach a safepoint | |
| 859 // (or at least increase the mean, if not the variance), the latter | |
| 860 // approach might make for a cleaner, more maintainable JVM design. | |
| 861 // | |
| 862 // Sneaking is vile and reprehensible and should be excised at the 1st | |
| 863 // opportunity. It's possible that the need for sneaking could be obviated | |
| 864 // as follows. Currently, a thread might (a) while TBIVM, call pthread_mutex_lock | |
| 865 // or ILock() thus acquiring the "physical" lock underlying Monitor/Mutex. | |
| 866 // (b) stall at the TBIVM exit point as a safepoint is in effect. Critically, | |
| 867 // it'll stall at the TBIVM reentry state transition after having acquired the | |
| 868 // underlying lock, but before having set _owner and having entered the actual | |
| 869 // critical section. The lock-sneaking facility leverages that fact and allowed the | |
| 870 // VM thread to logically acquire locks that had already be physically locked by mutators | |
| 871 // but where mutators were known blocked by the reentry thread state transition. | |
| 872 // | |
| 873 // If we were to modify the Monitor-Mutex so that TBIVM state transitions tightly | |
| 874 // wrapped calls to park(), then we could likely do away with sneaking. We'd | |
| 875 // decouple lock acquisition and parking. The critical invariant to eliminating | |
| 876 // sneaking is to ensure that we never "physically" acquire the lock while TBIVM. | |
| 877 // An easy way to accomplish this is to wrap the park calls in a narrow TBIVM jacket. | |
| 878 // One difficulty with this approach is that the TBIVM wrapper could recurse and | |
| 879 // call lock() deep from within a lock() call, while the MutexEvent was already enqueued. | |
| 880 // Using a stack (N=2 at minimum) of ParkEvents would take care of that problem. | |
| 881 // | |
| 882 // But of course the proper ultimate approach is to avoid schemes that require explicit | |
| 883 // sneaking or dependence on any any clever invariants or subtle implementation properties | |
| 884 // of Mutex-Monitor and instead directly address the underlying design flaw. | |
| 885 | |
| 886 void Monitor::lock (Thread * Self) { | |
| 887 #ifdef CHECK_UNHANDLED_OOPS | |
| 888 // Clear unhandled oops so we get a crash right away. Only clear for non-vm | |
| 889 // or GC threads. | |
| 890 if (Self->is_Java_thread()) { | |
| 891 Self->clear_unhandled_oops(); | |
| 892 } | |
| 893 #endif // CHECK_UNHANDLED_OOPS | |
| 894 | |
| 895 debug_only(check_prelock_state(Self)); | |
| 896 assert (_owner != Self , "invariant") ; | |
| 897 assert (_OnDeck != Self->_MutexEvent, "invariant") ; | |
| 898 | |
| 899 if (TryFast()) { | |
| 900 Exeunt: | |
| 901 assert (ILocked(), "invariant") ; | |
| 902 assert (owner() == NULL, "invariant"); | |
| 903 set_owner (Self); | |
| 904 return ; | |
| 905 } | |
| 906 | |
| 907 // The lock is contended ... | |
| 908 | |
| 909 bool can_sneak = Self->is_VM_thread() && SafepointSynchronize::is_at_safepoint(); | |
| 910 if (can_sneak && _owner == NULL) { | |
| 911 // a java thread has locked the lock but has not entered the | |
| 912 // critical region -- let's just pretend we've locked the lock | |
| 913 // and go on. we note this with _snuck so we can also | |
| 914 // pretend to unlock when the time comes. | |
| 915 _snuck = true; | |
| 916 goto Exeunt ; | |
| 917 } | |
| 918 | |
| 919 // Try a brief spin to avoid passing thru thread state transition ... | |
| 920 if (TrySpin (Self)) goto Exeunt ; | |
| 921 | |
| 922 check_block_state(Self); | |
| 923 if (Self->is_Java_thread()) { | |
| 14909 | 924 // Horribile dictu - we suffer through a state transition |
| 0 | 925 assert(rank() > Mutex::special, "Potential deadlock with special or lesser rank mutex"); |
| 926 ThreadBlockInVM tbivm ((JavaThread *) Self) ; | |
| 927 ILock (Self) ; | |
| 928 } else { | |
| 929 // Mirabile dictu | |
| 930 ILock (Self) ; | |
| 931 } | |
| 932 goto Exeunt ; | |
| 933 } | |
| 934 | |
| 935 void Monitor::lock() { | |
| 936 this->lock(Thread::current()); | |
| 937 } | |
| 938 | |
| 939 // Lock without safepoint check - a degenerate variant of lock(). | |
| 940 // Should ONLY be used by safepoint code and other code | |
| 941 // that is guaranteed not to block while running inside the VM. If this is called with | |
| 942 // thread state set to be in VM, the safepoint synchronization code will deadlock! | |
| 943 | |
| 944 void Monitor::lock_without_safepoint_check (Thread * Self) { | |
| 945 assert (_owner != Self, "invariant") ; | |
| 946 ILock (Self) ; | |
| 947 assert (_owner == NULL, "invariant"); | |
| 948 set_owner (Self); | |
| 949 } | |
| 950 | |
| 951 void Monitor::lock_without_safepoint_check () { | |
| 952 lock_without_safepoint_check (Thread::current()) ; | |
| 953 } | |
| 954 | |
| 955 | |
| 14909 | 956 // Returns true if thread succeceed [sic] in grabbing the lock, otherwise false. |
| 0 | 957 |
| 958 bool Monitor::try_lock() { | |
| 959 Thread * const Self = Thread::current(); | |
| 960 debug_only(check_prelock_state(Self)); | |
| 961 // assert(!thread->is_inside_signal_handler(), "don't lock inside signal handler"); | |
| 962 | |
| 963 // Special case, where all Java threads are stopped. | |
| 964 // The lock may have been acquired but _owner is not yet set. | |
| 965 // In that case the VM thread can safely grab the lock. | |
| 966 // It strikes me this should appear _after the TryLock() fails, below. | |
| 967 bool can_sneak = Self->is_VM_thread() && SafepointSynchronize::is_at_safepoint(); | |
| 968 if (can_sneak && _owner == NULL) { | |
| 969 set_owner(Self); // Do not need to be atomic, since we are at a safepoint | |
| 970 _snuck = true; | |
| 971 return true; | |
| 972 } | |
| 973 | |
| 974 if (TryLock()) { | |
| 975 // We got the lock | |
| 976 assert (_owner == NULL, "invariant"); | |
| 977 set_owner (Self); | |
| 978 return true; | |
| 979 } | |
| 980 return false; | |
| 981 } | |
| 982 | |
| 983 void Monitor::unlock() { | |
| 984 assert (_owner == Thread::current(), "invariant") ; | |
| 985 assert (_OnDeck != Thread::current()->_MutexEvent , "invariant") ; | |
| 986 set_owner (NULL) ; | |
| 987 if (_snuck) { | |
| 988 assert(SafepointSynchronize::is_at_safepoint() && Thread::current()->is_VM_thread(), "sneak"); | |
| 989 _snuck = false; | |
| 990 return ; | |
| 991 } | |
| 992 IUnlock (false) ; | |
| 993 } | |
| 994 | |
| 995 // Yet another degenerate version of Monitor::lock() or lock_without_safepoint_check() | |
| 996 // jvm_raw_lock() and _unlock() can be called by non-Java threads via JVM_RawMonitorEnter. | |
| 997 // | |
| 998 // There's no expectation that JVM_RawMonitors will interoperate properly with the native | |
| 999 // Mutex-Monitor constructs. We happen to implement JVM_RawMonitors in terms of | |
| 1000 // native Mutex-Monitors simply as a matter of convenience. A simple abstraction layer | |
| 1001 // over a pthread_mutex_t would work equally as well, but require more platform-specific | |
| 1002 // code -- a "PlatformMutex". Alternatively, a simply layer over muxAcquire-muxRelease | |
| 1003 // would work too. | |
| 1004 // | |
| 1005 // Since the caller might be a foreign thread, we don't necessarily have a Thread.MutexEvent | |
| 1006 // instance available. Instead, we transiently allocate a ParkEvent on-demand if | |
| 1007 // we encounter contention. That ParkEvent remains associated with the thread | |
| 1008 // until it manages to acquire the lock, at which time we return the ParkEvent | |
| 1009 // to the global ParkEvent free list. This is correct and suffices for our purposes. | |
| 1010 // | |
| 1011 // Beware that the original jvm_raw_unlock() had a "_snuck" test but that | |
| 1012 // jvm_raw_lock() didn't have the corresponding test. I suspect that's an | |
| 1013 // oversight, but I've replicated the original suspect logic in the new code ... | |
| 1014 | |
| 1015 void Monitor::jvm_raw_lock() { | |
| 1016 assert(rank() == native, "invariant"); | |
| 1017 | |
| 1018 if (TryLock()) { | |
| 1019 Exeunt: | |
| 1020 assert (ILocked(), "invariant") ; | |
| 1021 assert (_owner == NULL, "invariant"); | |
| 1022 // This can potentially be called by non-java Threads. Thus, the ThreadLocalStorage | |
| 1023 // might return NULL. Don't call set_owner since it will break on an NULL owner | |
| 1024 // Consider installing a non-null "ANON" distinguished value instead of just NULL. | |
| 1025 _owner = ThreadLocalStorage::thread(); | |
| 1026 return ; | |
| 1027 } | |
| 1028 | |
| 1029 if (TrySpin(NULL)) goto Exeunt ; | |
| 1030 | |
| 1031 // slow-path - apparent contention | |
| 1032 // Allocate a ParkEvent for transient use. | |
| 1033 // The ParkEvent remains associated with this thread until | |
| 1034 // the time the thread manages to acquire the lock. | |
| 1035 ParkEvent * const ESelf = ParkEvent::Allocate(NULL) ; | |
| 1036 ESelf->reset() ; | |
| 1037 OrderAccess::storeload() ; | |
| 1038 | |
| 1039 // Either Enqueue Self on cxq or acquire the outer lock. | |
| 1040 if (AcquireOrPush (ESelf)) { | |
| 1041 ParkEvent::Release (ESelf) ; // surrender the ParkEvent | |
| 1042 goto Exeunt ; | |
| 1043 } | |
| 1044 | |
| 1045 // At any given time there is at most one ondeck thread. | |
| 1046 // ondeck implies not resident on cxq and not resident on EntryList | |
| 1047 // Only the OnDeck thread can try to acquire -- contended for -- the lock. | |
| 1048 // CONSIDER: use Self->OnDeck instead of m->OnDeck. | |
| 1049 for (;;) { | |
| 1050 if (_OnDeck == ESelf && TrySpin(NULL)) break ; | |
| 1051 ParkCommon (ESelf, 0) ; | |
| 1052 } | |
| 1053 | |
| 1054 assert (_OnDeck == ESelf, "invariant") ; | |
| 1055 _OnDeck = NULL ; | |
| 1056 ParkEvent::Release (ESelf) ; // surrender the ParkEvent | |
| 1057 goto Exeunt ; | |
| 1058 } | |
| 1059 | |
| 1060 void Monitor::jvm_raw_unlock() { | |
| 1061 // Nearly the same as Monitor::unlock() ... | |
| 1062 // directly set _owner instead of using set_owner(null) | |
| 1063 _owner = NULL ; | |
| 1064 if (_snuck) { // ??? | |
| 1065 assert(SafepointSynchronize::is_at_safepoint() && Thread::current()->is_VM_thread(), "sneak"); | |
| 1066 _snuck = false; | |
| 1067 return ; | |
| 1068 } | |
| 1069 IUnlock(false) ; | |
| 1070 } | |
| 1071 | |
| 1072 bool Monitor::wait(bool no_safepoint_check, long timeout, bool as_suspend_equivalent) { | |
| 1073 Thread * const Self = Thread::current() ; | |
| 1074 assert (_owner == Self, "invariant") ; | |
| 1075 assert (ILocked(), "invariant") ; | |
| 1076 | |
| 1077 // as_suspend_equivalent logically implies !no_safepoint_check | |
| 1078 guarantee (!as_suspend_equivalent || !no_safepoint_check, "invariant") ; | |
| 1079 // !no_safepoint_check logically implies java_thread | |
| 1080 guarantee (no_safepoint_check || Self->is_Java_thread(), "invariant") ; | |
| 1081 | |
| 1082 #ifdef ASSERT | |
| 1083 Monitor * least = get_least_ranked_lock_besides_this(Self->owned_locks()); | |
| 1084 assert(least != this, "Specification of get_least_... call above"); | |
| 1085 if (least != NULL && least->rank() <= special) { | |
| 1086 tty->print("Attempting to wait on monitor %s/%d while holding" | |
| 1087 " lock %s/%d -- possible deadlock", | |
| 1088 name(), rank(), least->name(), least->rank()); | |
| 1089 assert(false, "Shouldn't block(wait) while holding a lock of rank special"); | |
| 1090 } | |
| 1091 #endif // ASSERT | |
| 1092 | |
| 1093 int wait_status ; | |
| 1094 // conceptually set the owner to NULL in anticipation of | |
| 1095 // abdicating the lock in wait | |
| 1096 set_owner(NULL); | |
| 1097 if (no_safepoint_check) { | |
| 1098 wait_status = IWait (Self, timeout) ; | |
| 1099 } else { | |
| 1100 assert (Self->is_Java_thread(), "invariant") ; | |
| 1101 JavaThread *jt = (JavaThread *)Self; | |
| 1102 | |
| 1103 // Enter safepoint region - ornate and Rococo ... | |
| 1104 ThreadBlockInVM tbivm(jt); | |
| 1105 OSThreadWaitState osts(Self->osthread(), false /* not Object.wait() */); | |
| 1106 | |
| 1107 if (as_suspend_equivalent) { | |
| 1108 jt->set_suspend_equivalent(); | |
| 1109 // cleared by handle_special_suspend_equivalent_condition() or | |
| 1110 // java_suspend_self() | |
| 1111 } | |
| 1112 | |
| 1113 wait_status = IWait (Self, timeout) ; | |
| 1114 | |
| 1115 // were we externally suspended while we were waiting? | |
| 1116 if (as_suspend_equivalent && jt->handle_special_suspend_equivalent_condition()) { | |
| 1117 // Our event wait has finished and we own the lock, but | |
| 1118 // while we were waiting another thread suspended us. We don't | |
| 1119 // want to hold the lock while suspended because that | |
| 1120 // would surprise the thread that suspended us. | |
| 1121 assert (ILocked(), "invariant") ; | |
| 1122 IUnlock (true) ; | |
| 1123 jt->java_suspend_self(); | |
| 1124 ILock (Self) ; | |
| 1125 assert (ILocked(), "invariant") ; | |
| 1126 } | |
| 1127 } | |
| 1128 | |
| 1129 // Conceptually reestablish ownership of the lock. | |
| 1130 // The "real" lock -- the LockByte -- was reacquired by IWait(). | |
| 1131 assert (ILocked(), "invariant") ; | |
| 1132 assert (_owner == NULL, "invariant") ; | |
| 1133 set_owner (Self) ; | |
| 1134 return wait_status != 0 ; // return true IFF timeout | |
| 1135 } | |
| 1136 | |
| 1137 Monitor::~Monitor() { | |
| 1138 assert ((UNS(_owner)|UNS(_LockWord.FullWord)|UNS(_EntryList)|UNS(_WaitSet)|UNS(_OnDeck)) == 0, "") ; | |
| 1139 } | |
| 1140 | |
|
55
2a8eb116ebbe
6610420: Debug VM crashes during monitor lock rank checking
xlu
parents:
0
diff
changeset
|
1141 void Monitor::ClearMonitor (Monitor * m, const char *name) { |
| 0 | 1142 m->_owner = NULL ; |
| 1143 m->_snuck = false ; | |
|
55
2a8eb116ebbe
6610420: Debug VM crashes during monitor lock rank checking
xlu
parents:
0
diff
changeset
|
1144 if (name == NULL) { |
|
2a8eb116ebbe
6610420: Debug VM crashes during monitor lock rank checking
xlu
parents:
0
diff
changeset
|
1145 strcpy(m->_name, "UNKNOWN") ; |
|
2a8eb116ebbe
6610420: Debug VM crashes during monitor lock rank checking
xlu
parents:
0
diff
changeset
|
1146 } else { |
|
2a8eb116ebbe
6610420: Debug VM crashes during monitor lock rank checking
xlu
parents:
0
diff
changeset
|
1147 strncpy(m->_name, name, MONITOR_NAME_LEN - 1); |
|
2a8eb116ebbe
6610420: Debug VM crashes during monitor lock rank checking
xlu
parents:
0
diff
changeset
|
1148 m->_name[MONITOR_NAME_LEN - 1] = '\0'; |
|
2a8eb116ebbe
6610420: Debug VM crashes during monitor lock rank checking
xlu
parents:
0
diff
changeset
|
1149 } |
| 0 | 1150 m->_LockWord.FullWord = 0 ; |
| 1151 m->_EntryList = NULL ; | |
| 1152 m->_OnDeck = NULL ; | |
| 1153 m->_WaitSet = NULL ; | |
| 1154 m->_WaitLock[0] = 0 ; | |
| 1155 } | |
| 1156 | |
| 1157 Monitor::Monitor() { ClearMonitor(this); } | |
| 1158 | |
| 1159 Monitor::Monitor (int Rank, const char * name, bool allow_vm_block) { | |
|
55
2a8eb116ebbe
6610420: Debug VM crashes during monitor lock rank checking
xlu
parents:
0
diff
changeset
|
1160 ClearMonitor (this, name) ; |
| 0 | 1161 #ifdef ASSERT |
| 1162 _allow_vm_block = allow_vm_block; | |
| 1163 _rank = Rank ; | |
| 1164 #endif | |
| 1165 } | |
| 1166 | |
| 1167 Mutex::~Mutex() { | |
| 1168 assert ((UNS(_owner)|UNS(_LockWord.FullWord)|UNS(_EntryList)|UNS(_WaitSet)|UNS(_OnDeck)) == 0, "") ; | |
| 1169 } | |
| 1170 | |
| 1171 Mutex::Mutex (int Rank, const char * name, bool allow_vm_block) { | |
|
55
2a8eb116ebbe
6610420: Debug VM crashes during monitor lock rank checking
xlu
parents:
0
diff
changeset
|
1172 ClearMonitor ((Monitor *) this, name) ; |
| 0 | 1173 #ifdef ASSERT |
| 1174 _allow_vm_block = allow_vm_block; | |
| 1175 _rank = Rank ; | |
| 1176 #endif | |
| 1177 } | |
| 1178 | |
| 1179 bool Monitor::owned_by_self() const { | |
| 1180 bool ret = _owner == Thread::current(); | |
| 1181 assert (!ret || _LockWord.Bytes[_LSBINDEX] != 0, "invariant") ; | |
| 1182 return ret; | |
| 1183 } | |
| 1184 | |
| 1185 void Monitor::print_on_error(outputStream* st) const { | |
| 1186 st->print("[" PTR_FORMAT, this); | |
| 1187 st->print("] %s", _name); | |
| 1188 st->print(" - owner thread: " PTR_FORMAT, _owner); | |
| 1189 } | |
| 1190 | |
| 1191 | |
| 1192 | |
| 1193 | |
| 1194 // ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
| 1195 // Non-product code | |
| 1196 | |
| 1197 #ifndef PRODUCT | |
| 1198 void Monitor::print_on(outputStream* st) const { | |
| 1199 st->print_cr("Mutex: [0x%lx/0x%lx] %s - owner: 0x%lx", this, _LockWord.FullWord, _name, _owner); | |
| 1200 } | |
| 1201 #endif | |
| 1202 | |
| 1203 #ifndef PRODUCT | |
| 1204 #ifdef ASSERT | |
| 1205 Monitor * Monitor::get_least_ranked_lock(Monitor * locks) { | |
| 1206 Monitor *res, *tmp; | |
| 1207 for (res = tmp = locks; tmp != NULL; tmp = tmp->next()) { | |
| 1208 if (tmp->rank() < res->rank()) { | |
| 1209 res = tmp; | |
| 1210 } | |
| 1211 } | |
| 1212 if (!SafepointSynchronize::is_at_safepoint()) { | |
| 1213 // In this case, we expect the held locks to be | |
| 1214 // in increasing rank order (modulo any native ranks) | |
| 1215 for (tmp = locks; tmp != NULL; tmp = tmp->next()) { | |
| 1216 if (tmp->next() != NULL) { | |
| 1217 assert(tmp->rank() == Mutex::native || | |
| 1218 tmp->rank() <= tmp->next()->rank(), "mutex rank anomaly?"); | |
| 1219 } | |
| 1220 } | |
| 1221 } | |
| 1222 return res; | |
| 1223 } | |
| 1224 | |
| 1225 Monitor* Monitor::get_least_ranked_lock_besides_this(Monitor* locks) { | |
| 1226 Monitor *res, *tmp; | |
| 1227 for (res = NULL, tmp = locks; tmp != NULL; tmp = tmp->next()) { | |
| 1228 if (tmp != this && (res == NULL || tmp->rank() < res->rank())) { | |
| 1229 res = tmp; | |
| 1230 } | |
| 1231 } | |
| 1232 if (!SafepointSynchronize::is_at_safepoint()) { | |
| 1233 // In this case, we expect the held locks to be | |
| 1234 // in increasing rank order (modulo any native ranks) | |
| 1235 for (tmp = locks; tmp != NULL; tmp = tmp->next()) { | |
| 1236 if (tmp->next() != NULL) { | |
| 1237 assert(tmp->rank() == Mutex::native || | |
| 1238 tmp->rank() <= tmp->next()->rank(), "mutex rank anomaly?"); | |
| 1239 } | |
| 1240 } | |
| 1241 } | |
| 1242 return res; | |
| 1243 } | |
| 1244 | |
| 1245 | |
| 1246 bool Monitor::contains(Monitor* locks, Monitor * lock) { | |
| 1247 for (; locks != NULL; locks = locks->next()) { | |
| 1248 if (locks == lock) | |
| 1249 return true; | |
| 1250 } | |
| 1251 return false; | |
| 1252 } | |
| 1253 #endif | |
| 1254 | |
| 1255 // Called immediately after lock acquisition or release as a diagnostic | |
| 1256 // to track the lock-set of the thread and test for rank violations that | |
| 1257 // might indicate exposure to deadlock. | |
| 1258 // Rather like an EventListener for _owner (:>). | |
| 1259 | |
| 1260 void Monitor::set_owner_implementation(Thread *new_owner) { | |
| 1261 // This function is solely responsible for maintaining | |
| 1262 // and checking the invariant that threads and locks | |
| 1263 // are in a 1/N relation, with some some locks unowned. | |
| 1264 // It uses the Mutex::_owner, Mutex::_next, and | |
| 1265 // Thread::_owned_locks fields, and no other function | |
| 1266 // changes those fields. | |
| 1267 // It is illegal to set the mutex from one non-NULL | |
| 1268 // owner to another--it must be owned by NULL as an | |
| 1269 // intermediate state. | |
| 1270 | |
| 1271 if (new_owner != NULL) { | |
| 1272 // the thread is acquiring this lock | |
| 1273 | |
| 1274 assert(new_owner == Thread::current(), "Should I be doing this?"); | |
| 1275 assert(_owner == NULL, "setting the owner thread of an already owned mutex"); | |
| 1276 _owner = new_owner; // set the owner | |
| 1277 | |
| 1278 // link "this" into the owned locks list | |
| 1279 | |
| 1280 #ifdef ASSERT // Thread::_owned_locks is under the same ifdef | |
| 1281 Monitor* locks = get_least_ranked_lock(new_owner->owned_locks()); | |
| 1282 // Mutex::set_owner_implementation is a friend of Thread | |
| 1283 | |
| 1284 assert(this->rank() >= 0, "bad lock rank"); | |
| 1285 | |
| 1286 // Deadlock avoidance rules require us to acquire Mutexes only in | |
| 1287 // a global total order. For example m1 is the lowest ranked mutex | |
| 1288 // that the thread holds and m2 is the mutex the thread is trying | |
| 1289 // to acquire, then deadlock avoidance rules require that the rank | |
| 1290 // of m2 be less than the rank of m1. | |
| 1291 // The rank Mutex::native is an exception in that it is not subject | |
| 1292 // to the verification rules. | |
| 1293 // Here are some further notes relating to mutex acquisition anomalies: | |
| 1294 // . under Solaris, the interrupt lock gets acquired when doing | |
| 1295 // profiling, so any lock could be held. | |
| 1296 // . it is also ok to acquire Safepoint_lock at the very end while we | |
| 1297 // already hold Terminator_lock - may happen because of periodic safepoints | |
| 1298 if (this->rank() != Mutex::native && | |
| 1299 this->rank() != Mutex::suspend_resume && | |
| 1300 locks != NULL && locks->rank() <= this->rank() && | |
| 1301 !SafepointSynchronize::is_at_safepoint() && | |
| 1302 this != Interrupt_lock && this != ProfileVM_lock && | |
| 1303 !(this == Safepoint_lock && contains(locks, Terminator_lock) && | |
| 1304 SafepointSynchronize::is_synchronizing())) { | |
| 1305 new_owner->print_owned_locks(); | |
|
1490
f03d0a26bf83
6888954: argument formatting for assert() and friends
jcoomes
parents:
196
diff
changeset
|
1306 fatal(err_msg("acquiring lock %s/%d out of order with lock %s/%d -- " |
|
f03d0a26bf83
6888954: argument formatting for assert() and friends
jcoomes
parents:
196
diff
changeset
|
1307 "possible deadlock", this->name(), this->rank(), |
|
f03d0a26bf83
6888954: argument formatting for assert() and friends
jcoomes
parents:
196
diff
changeset
|
1308 locks->name(), locks->rank())); |
| 0 | 1309 } |
| 1310 | |
| 1311 this->_next = new_owner->_owned_locks; | |
| 1312 new_owner->_owned_locks = this; | |
| 1313 #endif | |
| 1314 | |
| 1315 } else { | |
| 1316 // the thread is releasing this lock | |
| 1317 | |
| 1318 Thread* old_owner = _owner; | |
| 1319 debug_only(_last_owner = old_owner); | |
| 1320 | |
| 1321 assert(old_owner != NULL, "removing the owner thread of an unowned mutex"); | |
| 1322 assert(old_owner == Thread::current(), "removing the owner thread of an unowned mutex"); | |
| 1323 | |
| 1324 _owner = NULL; // set the owner | |
| 1325 | |
| 1326 #ifdef ASSERT | |
| 1327 Monitor *locks = old_owner->owned_locks(); | |
| 1328 | |
| 1329 // remove "this" from the owned locks list | |
| 1330 | |
| 1331 Monitor *prev = NULL; | |
| 1332 bool found = false; | |
| 1333 for (; locks != NULL; prev = locks, locks = locks->next()) { | |
| 1334 if (locks == this) { | |
| 1335 found = true; | |
| 1336 break; | |
| 1337 } | |
| 1338 } | |
| 1339 assert(found, "Removing a lock not owned"); | |
| 1340 if (prev == NULL) { | |
| 1341 old_owner->_owned_locks = _next; | |
| 1342 } else { | |
| 1343 prev->_next = _next; | |
| 1344 } | |
| 1345 _next = NULL; | |
| 1346 #endif | |
| 1347 } | |
| 1348 } | |
| 1349 | |
| 1350 | |
| 1351 // Factored out common sanity checks for locking mutex'es. Used by lock() and try_lock() | |
| 1352 void Monitor::check_prelock_state(Thread *thread) { | |
| 1353 assert((!thread->is_Java_thread() || ((JavaThread *)thread)->thread_state() == _thread_in_vm) | |
| 1354 || rank() == Mutex::special, "wrong thread state for using locks"); | |
| 1355 if (StrictSafepointChecks) { | |
| 1356 if (thread->is_VM_thread() && !allow_vm_block()) { | |
|
1490
f03d0a26bf83
6888954: argument formatting for assert() and friends
jcoomes
parents:
196
diff
changeset
|
1357 fatal(err_msg("VM thread using lock %s (not allowed to block on)", |
|
f03d0a26bf83
6888954: argument formatting for assert() and friends
jcoomes
parents:
196
diff
changeset
|
1358 name())); |
| 0 | 1359 } |
| 1360 debug_only(if (rank() != Mutex::special) \ | |
| 1361 thread->check_for_valid_safepoint_state(false);) | |
| 1362 } | |
| 11151 | 1363 if (thread->is_Watcher_thread()) { |
| 1364 assert(!WatcherThread::watcher_thread()->has_crash_protection(), | |
| 1365 "locking not allowed when crash protection is set"); | |
| 1366 } | |
| 0 | 1367 } |
| 1368 | |
| 1369 void Monitor::check_block_state(Thread *thread) { | |
| 1370 if (!_allow_vm_block && thread->is_VM_thread()) { | |
| 1371 warning("VM thread blocked on lock"); | |
| 1372 print(); | |
| 1373 BREAKPOINT; | |
| 1374 } | |
| 1375 assert(_owner != thread, "deadlock: blocking on monitor owned by current thread"); | |
| 1376 } | |
| 1377 | |
| 1378 #endif // PRODUCT |