Mercurial > hg > truffle
annotate test/runtime/7116786/Test7116786.java @ 20246:b2daaf70fab2
8046233: VerifyError on backward branch
Summary: Remove check that causes the VerifyError
Reviewed-by: dholmes, coleenp, acorn
| author | hseigel |
|---|---|
| date | Tue, 05 Aug 2014 09:11:35 -0400 |
| parents | aa758f0c5b1c |
| children |
| rev | line source |
|---|---|
| 6605 | 1 /* |
| 20246 | 2 * Copyright (c) 2012, 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
| 6605 | 3 * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER. |
| 4 * | |
| 5 * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it | |
| 6 * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as | |
| 7 * published by the Free Software Foundation. | |
| 8 * | |
| 9 * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT | |
| 10 * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or | |
| 11 * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License | |
| 12 * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that | |
| 13 * accompanied this code). | |
| 14 * | |
| 15 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version | |
| 16 * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, | |
| 17 * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA. | |
| 18 * | |
| 19 * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA | |
| 20 * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any | |
| 21 * questions. | |
| 22 * | |
| 23 */ | |
| 24 | |
| 25 /* | |
| 26 * @test Test7116786 | |
| 27 * @summary verify that VerifyError messages are as expected | |
| 28 * @library testcases.jar | |
| 29 * @run main/othervm -Xverify:all Test7116786 | |
| 30 */ | |
| 31 | |
| 32 | |
| 33 /** | |
| 34 * This class contains information regarding when a VerifyError is thrown | |
| 35 * in the verifier. Most of the data is informational-only, and can be | |
| 36 * used to track down where and why VerifyErrors are thrown. As such it | |
| 37 * is possible the information may go out-of-date. | |
| 38 * | |
| 39 * The only fields used for the purpose of testing is the 'caseName' and | |
| 40 * the 'message'. The 'caseName' corresponds to a classfile which exhibits | |
| 41 * the VerifyError, and the 'message' is a regular expression which we expect | |
| 42 * to match the verify error message. If the 'message' doesn't match what | |
| 43 * we expect, it warrents investigation to see if we are still triggering | |
| 44 * the VerifyError that we expect. It could simply just be that the message | |
| 45 * changed, which is fine. | |
| 46 * | |
| 47 * Some cases are not testable, either because the code is probably unreachable | |
| 48 * or the test classfile would be too onerous to create. These cases are | |
| 49 * marked with 'testable' == false, and the test runner will skip them. | |
| 50 */ | |
| 51 class Case { | |
| 52 private String caseName; // Name of the case | |
| 53 private String file; // Source file where VerifyError is thrown | |
| 54 private String location; // enclosing function or switch case | |
| 55 private String description; // What causes this VerifyError | |
| 56 private String message; // The VerifyError message used. | |
| 57 | |
| 58 private boolean testable; // Whether this case is testable or not. | |
| 59 | |
| 60 public Case(String caseName, String file, boolean testable, | |
| 61 String location, String description, String message) { | |
| 62 this.caseName = caseName; | |
| 63 this.file = file; | |
| 64 this.testable = testable; | |
| 65 this.location = location; | |
| 66 this.description = description; | |
| 67 this.message = message; | |
| 68 } | |
| 69 | |
| 70 String getCaseName() { return this.caseName; } | |
| 71 String getFile() { return this.file; } | |
| 72 String getLocation() { return this.location; } | |
| 73 String getDescription() { return this.description; } | |
| 74 String getMessage() { return this.message; } | |
| 75 | |
| 76 boolean isTestable() { return this.testable; } | |
| 77 } | |
| 78 | |
| 79 /** | |
| 80 * These are the locations in the source code where VerifyErrors are thrown | |
| 81 * as of today, 2012/07/18. These may change as the verification code is | |
| 82 * modified, which is ok. This test is trying to provide coverage for all | |
| 83 * VerifyErrors (just to make sure there are no crashes) and it's probably | |
| 84 * not necessary to update it every time the VM changes. | |
| 85 */ | |
| 86 class VerifyErrorCases { | |
| 87 public static final Case[] cases = { | |
| 88 | |
| 89 new Case("case00", "stackMapFrame.cpp", true, "pop_stack_ex", | |
| 90 "stack underflow", | |
| 91 "Operand stack underflow"), | |
| 92 | |
| 93 new Case("case01", "stackMapFrame.cpp", true, "pop_stack_ex", | |
| 94 "stack pop not assignable to expected", | |
| 95 "Bad type on operand stack"), | |
| 96 | |
| 97 new Case("case02", "stackMapFrame.cpp", true, "get_local", | |
| 98 "local index out-of-bounds", | |
| 99 "Local variable table overflow"), | |
| 100 | |
| 101 new Case("case03", "stackMapFrame.cpp", true, "get_local", | |
| 102 "local not assignable to expected", | |
| 103 "Bad local variable type"), | |
| 104 | |
| 105 new Case("case04", "stackMapFrame.cpp", true, "get_local_2", | |
| 106 "local index out-of-bounds [type2]", | |
| 107 "get long/double overflows locals"), | |
| 108 | |
| 109 new Case("case05", "stackMapFrame.cpp", true, "get_local_2", | |
| 110 "local not assignabled to expected [type2]", | |
| 111 "Bad local variable type"), | |
| 112 | |
| 113 /* Unreachable: Can't split long/double on stack */ | |
| 114 new Case("case06", "stackMapFrame.cpp", false, "get_local_2", | |
| 115 "local second-word not assignabled to expected", | |
| 116 "Bad local variable type"), | |
| 117 | |
| 118 new Case("case07", "stackMapFrame.cpp", true, "set_local", | |
| 119 "local index out-of-bounds", | |
| 120 "Local variable table overflow"), | |
| 121 | |
| 122 new Case("case08", "stackMapFrame.cpp", true, "set_local_2", | |
| 123 "local index out-of-bounds [type2]", | |
| 124 "Local variable table overflow"), | |
| 125 | |
| 126 new Case("case09", "stackMapFrame.hpp", true, "push_stack", | |
| 127 "stack overflow", | |
| 128 "Operand stack overflow"), | |
| 129 | |
| 130 new Case("case10", "stackMapFrame.hpp", true, "push_stack_2", | |
| 131 "stack overflow [type2]", | |
| 132 "Operand stack overflow"), | |
| 133 | |
| 134 new Case("case11", "stackMapFrame.hpp", true, "pop_stack", | |
| 135 "stack underflow", | |
| 136 "Operand stack underflow"), | |
| 137 | |
| 138 new Case("case12", "stackMapTable.cpp", true, "StackMapTable ctor", | |
| 139 "stackmap offset beyond code size", | |
| 140 "StackMapTable error: bad offset"), | |
| 141 | |
| 142 new Case("case13", "stackMapTable.cpp", true, "match_stackmap", | |
| 143 "no stackmap frame at expected location", | |
| 144 "Expecting a stackmap frame at branch target "), | |
| 145 | |
| 146 new Case("case14", "stackMapTable.cpp", true, "check_jump_target", | |
| 147 "no stackmap frame at jump location or bad jump", | |
| 148 "Inconsistent stackmap frames at branch target "), | |
| 149 | |
| 20246 | 150 /* Backward jump with uninit is allowed starting with JDK 8 */ |
| 151 new Case("case15", "stackMapTable.cpp", false, "check_new_object", | |
| 6605 | 152 "backward jump with uninit", |
| 153 "Uninitialized object exists on backward branch "), | |
| 154 | |
| 155 /* Unreachable: wide instructions verified during bytecode analysis */ | |
| 156 new Case("case16", "verifier.cpp", false, "loop header", | |
| 157 "bad op in wide instruction", | |
| 158 "Bad wide instruction"), | |
| 159 | |
| 160 new Case("case17", "verifier.cpp", true, "case iaload", | |
| 161 "TOS not X array", | |
| 162 "Bad type on operand stack in iaload"), | |
| 163 | |
| 164 new Case("case18", "verifier.cpp", true, "case baload", | |
| 165 "TOS not X array", | |
| 166 "Bad type on operand stack in baload"), | |
| 167 | |
| 168 new Case("case19", "verifier.cpp", true, "case caload", | |
| 169 "TOS not X array", | |
| 170 "Bad type on operand stack in caload"), | |
| 171 | |
| 172 new Case("case20", "verifier.cpp", true, "case saload", | |
| 173 "TOS not X array", | |
| 174 "Bad type on operand stack in saload"), | |
| 175 | |
| 176 new Case("case21", "verifier.cpp", true, "case laload", | |
| 177 "TOS not X array", | |
| 178 "Bad type on operand stack in laload"), | |
| 179 | |
| 180 new Case("case22", "verifier.cpp", true, "case faload", | |
| 181 "TOS not X array", | |
| 182 "Bad type on operand stack in faload"), | |
| 183 | |
| 184 new Case("case23", "verifier.cpp", true, "case daload", | |
| 185 "TOS not X array", | |
| 186 "Bad type on operand stack in daload"), | |
| 187 | |
| 188 new Case("case24", "verifier.cpp", true, "case aaload", | |
| 189 "TOS not X array", | |
| 190 "Bad type on operand stack in aaload"), | |
| 191 | |
| 192 new Case("case25", "verifier.cpp", true, "case iastore", | |
| 193 "TOS not int array", | |
| 194 "Bad type on operand stack in iastore"), | |
| 195 | |
| 196 new Case("case26", "verifier.cpp", true, "case bastore", | |
| 197 "TOS not byte array", | |
| 198 "Bad type on operand stack in bastore"), | |
| 199 | |
| 200 new Case("case27", "verifier.cpp", true, "case castore", | |
| 201 "TOS not char array", | |
| 202 "Bad type on operand stack in castore"), | |
| 203 | |
| 204 new Case("case28", "verifier.cpp", true, "case sastore", | |
| 205 "TOS not short array", | |
| 206 "Bad type on operand stack in sastore"), | |
| 207 | |
| 208 new Case("case29", "verifier.cpp", true, "case lastore", | |
| 209 "TOS not long array", | |
| 210 "Bad type on operand stack in lastore"), | |
| 211 | |
| 212 new Case("case30", "verifier.cpp", true, "case fastore", | |
| 213 "TOS not float array", | |
| 214 "Bad type on operand stack in fastore"), | |
| 215 | |
| 216 new Case("case31", "verifier.cpp", true, "case dastore", | |
| 217 "TOS not double array", | |
| 218 "Bad type on operand stack in dastore"), | |
| 219 | |
| 220 new Case("case32", "verifier.cpp", true, "case aastore", | |
| 221 "TOS not object array", | |
| 222 "Bad type on operand stack in aastore"), | |
| 223 | |
| 224 /* Unreachable: In order to hit this case, we would need a | |
| 225 * category2_1st at TOS which is not possible. */ | |
| 226 new Case("case33", "verifier.cpp", false, "case pop2", | |
| 227 "TOS is category2_1st (would split)", | |
| 228 "Bad type on operand stack in pop2"), | |
| 229 | |
| 230 /* Unreachable: In order to hit this case, we would need a | |
| 231 * category2_1st at stack depth 2 with category_1 on TOS which is not | |
| 232 * possible. */ | |
| 233 new Case("case34", "verifier.cpp", false, "case dup_x2", | |
| 234 "TOS-1 is category2_1st (would split)", | |
| 235 "Bad type on operand stack in dup_x2"), | |
| 236 | |
| 237 /* Unreachable: In order to hit this case, we would need a | |
| 238 * category2_1st at TOS which is not possible. */ | |
| 239 new Case("case35", "verifier.cpp", false, "case dup2", | |
| 240 "TOS-1 is category2_1st (would split)", | |
| 241 "Bad type on operand stack in dup2"), | |
| 242 | |
| 243 /* Unreachable: In order to hit this case, we would need a | |
| 244 * category2_1st at TOS which is not possible. */ | |
| 245 new Case("case36", "verifier.cpp", false, "case dup2_x1", | |
| 246 "TOS-1 is category2_1st (would split)", | |
| 247 "Bad type on operand stack in dup2_x1"), | |
| 248 | |
| 249 /* Unreachable: In order to hit this case, we would need a | |
| 250 * category2_1st at TOS which is not possible. */ | |
| 251 new Case("case37", "verifier.cpp", false, "case dup2_x2", | |
| 252 "TOS-1 is category2_1st (would split)", | |
| 253 "Bad type on operand stack in dup2_x2"), | |
| 254 | |
| 255 /* Unreachable: In order to hit this case, we would need a | |
| 256 * category2_1st at stack depth 3 with either 2 category_1 or 1 | |
| 257 * category_2 on TOS, which is not possible. */ | |
| 258 new Case("case38", "verifier.cpp", false, "case dup2_x2", | |
| 259 "TOS-3 is category2_1st (would split)", | |
| 260 "Bad type on operand stack in dup2_x2"), | |
| 261 | |
| 262 new Case("case39", "verifier.cpp", true, "case return", | |
| 263 "return type of method is not void", | |
| 264 "Method expects a return value"), | |
| 265 | |
| 266 new Case("case40", "verifier.cpp", true, "case return", | |
| 267 "return with uninitialized this ", | |
| 268 "Constructor must call super() or this() before return"), | |
| 269 | |
| 270 new Case("case41", "verifier.cpp", true, "case new", | |
| 271 "cp index not a class type", | |
| 272 "Illegal new instruction"), | |
| 273 | |
| 274 new Case("case42", "verifier.cpp", true, "case arraylength", | |
| 275 "TOS is not an array", | |
| 276 "Bad type on operand stack in arraylength"), | |
| 277 | |
| 278 new Case("case43", "verifier.cpp", true, "case multianewarray", | |
| 279 "CP index does not refer to array type", | |
| 280 "Illegal constant pool index in multianewarray instruction"), | |
| 281 | |
| 282 new Case("case44", "verifier.cpp", true, "case multianewarray", | |
| 283 "Bad dimension (<1) or does not match CP signature", | |
| 284 "Illegal dimension in multianewarray instruction: "), | |
| 285 | |
| 286 new Case("case45", "verifier.cpp", true, "case default", | |
| 287 "Unrecognized bytecode", | |
| 288 "Bad instruction: "), | |
| 289 | |
| 290 new Case("case46", "verifier.cpp", true, "loop end", | |
| 291 "control flow falls off method", | |
| 292 "Control flow falls through code end"), | |
| 293 | |
| 294 new Case("case47", "verifier.cpp", true, "generate_code_data", | |
| 295 "illegal bytecode via RawBytecodeStream (breakpoint)", | |
| 296 "Bad instruction"), | |
| 297 | |
| 298 new Case("case48", "verifier.cpp", true, "generate_code_data", | |
| 299 "illegal bytecode via RawBytecodeStream (other illegal)", | |
| 300 "Bad instruction"), | |
| 301 | |
| 302 new Case("case49", "verifier.cpp", true, | |
| 303 "verify_exception_handler_table", | |
| 304 "catch_type is not throwable", | |
| 305 "Catch type is not a subclass of Throwable in " + | |
| 306 "exception handler "), | |
| 307 | |
| 308 new Case("case50", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_stackmap_table", | |
| 309 "missing a stack map frame @ target location (mid table)", | |
| 310 "Expecting a stack map frame"), | |
| 311 | |
| 312 new Case("case51", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_stackmap_table", | |
| 313 "stack map does not match?", | |
| 314 "Instruction type does not match stack map"), | |
| 315 | |
| 316 new Case("case52", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_stackmap_table", | |
| 317 "missing a stack map frame @ target location (end of table)", | |
| 318 "Expecting a stack map frame"), | |
| 319 | |
| 320 new Case("case53", "verifier.cpp", true, | |
| 321 "verify_exception_handler_targets", | |
| 322 "stackmap mismatch at exception handler", | |
| 323 "Stack map does not match the one at exception handler "), | |
| 324 | |
| 325 new Case("case54", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_cp_index", | |
| 326 "constant pool index is out-of-bounds", | |
| 327 "Illegal constant pool index "), | |
| 328 | |
| 329 new Case("case55", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_cp_type", | |
| 330 "constant pool entry is not expected type", | |
| 331 "Illegal type at constant pool entry "), | |
| 332 | |
| 333 new Case("case56", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_cp_class_type", | |
| 334 "constant pool entry is not an object type", | |
| 335 "Illegal type at constant pool entry "), | |
| 336 | |
| 337 /* Unreachable: verify_cp_type gates this case */ | |
| 338 new Case("case57", "verifier.cpp", false, "verify_ldc", | |
| 339 "invalid constant pool index in ldc", | |
| 340 "Invalid index in ldc"), | |
| 341 | |
|
8838
aa758f0c5b1c
8010833: Test7116786.java is failing on most configs after fix for 8010667
hseigel
parents:
6605
diff
changeset
|
342 /* No longer a valid test case for bytecode version >= 51. Nonzero |
|
aa758f0c5b1c
8010833: Test7116786.java is failing on most configs after fix for 8010667
hseigel
parents:
6605
diff
changeset
|
343 * padding bytes are permitted with lookupswitch and tableswitch |
|
aa758f0c5b1c
8010833: Test7116786.java is failing on most configs after fix for 8010667
hseigel
parents:
6605
diff
changeset
|
344 * bytecodes as of JVMS 3d edition */ |
|
aa758f0c5b1c
8010833: Test7116786.java is failing on most configs after fix for 8010667
hseigel
parents:
6605
diff
changeset
|
345 new Case("case58", "verifier.cpp", false, "verify_switch", |
| 6605 | 346 "bad switch padding", |
|
8838
aa758f0c5b1c
8010833: Test7116786.java is failing on most configs after fix for 8010667
hseigel
parents:
6605
diff
changeset
|
347 "Nonzero padding byte in lookupswitch or tableswitch"), |
| 6605 | 348 |
| 349 new Case("case59", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_switch", | |
| 350 "tableswitch low is greater than high", | |
| 351 "low must be less than or equal to high in tableswitch"), | |
| 352 | |
| 353 /* Unreachable on 64-bit? Only way to get here is to overflow | |
| 354 * the 'keys' variable which can't happen on 64-bit since we're dealing | |
| 355 * with 32-bit values. Perhaps reachable on 32-bit but the | |
| 356 * triggering class would be quite large */ | |
| 357 new Case("case60", "verifier.cpp", false, "verify_switch", | |
| 358 "high - low + 1 < 0 (overflow?)", | |
| 359 "too many keys in tableswitch"), | |
| 360 | |
| 361 /* Would have to create a 16G classfile to trip this. Possible but | |
| 362 * not reasonable to do in a test. */ | |
| 363 new Case("case61", "verifier.cpp", false, "verify_switch", | |
| 364 "lookupswitch keys < 0", | |
| 365 "number of keys in lookupswitch less than 0"), | |
| 366 | |
| 367 new Case("case62", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_switch", | |
| 368 "lookupswitch keys out-of-order", | |
| 369 "Bad lookupswitch instruction"), | |
| 370 | |
| 371 /* Unreachable: Class file parser verifies Fieldref contents */ | |
| 372 new Case("case63", "verifier.cpp", false, "verify_field_instructions", | |
| 373 "referenced class is not an CP object", | |
| 374 "Expecting reference to class in class "), | |
| 375 | |
| 376 new Case("case64", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_field_instructions", | |
| 377 "TOS not assignable to field type in putfield", | |
| 378 "Bad type on operand stack in putfield"), | |
| 379 | |
| 380 new Case("case65", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_field_instructions", | |
| 381 "TOS not assignable to class when accessing protected field", | |
| 382 "Bad access to protected data in getfield"), | |
| 383 | |
| 384 new Case("case66", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_invoke_init", | |
| 385 "Uninit_this is not of the current type or it's supertype", | |
| 386 "Bad <init> method call"), | |
| 387 | |
| 388 /* Unreachable: Stack map parsing ensures valid type and new | |
| 389 * instructions have a valid BCI. */ | |
| 390 new Case("case67", "verifier.cpp", false, "verify_invoke_init", | |
| 391 "Uninit type with bad new instruction index", | |
| 392 "Expecting new instruction"), | |
| 393 | |
| 394 new Case("case68", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_invoke_init", | |
| 395 "calling other class's <init> method", | |
| 396 "Call to wrong <init> method"), | |
| 397 | |
| 398 new Case("case69", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_invoke_init", | |
| 399 "Calling protected <init> and type unassignable from current", | |
| 400 "Bad access to protected <init> method"), | |
| 401 | |
| 402 new Case("case70", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_invoke_init", | |
| 403 "TOS is not an uninitialized (or Uninit_this) type", | |
| 404 "Bad operand type when invoking <init>"), | |
| 405 | |
| 406 new Case("case71", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_invoke_instructions", | |
| 407 "Arg count in instruction doesn't match signature", | |
| 408 "Inconsistent args count operand in invokeinterface"), | |
| 409 | |
| 410 new Case("case72", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_invoke_instructions", | |
| 411 "Non-zero pad in invokeinterface", | |
| 412 "Fourth operand byte of invokeinterface must be zero"), | |
| 413 | |
| 414 new Case("case73", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_invoke_instructions", | |
| 415 "Non-zero pad in invokedynamic", | |
| 416 "Third and fourth operand bytes of " + | |
| 417 "invokedynamic must be zero"), | |
| 418 | |
| 419 new Case("case74", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_invoke_instructions", | |
| 420 "Non-invokespecial trying to invoke a '<' method", | |
| 421 "Illegal call to internal method"), | |
| 422 | |
| 423 new Case("case75", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_invoke_instructions", | |
| 424 "invokespecial and current unassignable from referenced type", | |
| 425 "Bad invokespecial instruction: current class isn't " + | |
| 426 "assignable to reference class."), | |
| 427 | |
| 428 new Case("case76", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_invoke_instructions", | |
| 429 "TOS not assignable to current when calling protected method", | |
| 430 "Bad access to protected data in invokevirtual"), | |
| 431 | |
| 432 /* Unreachable: class file parser enforces void signature */ | |
| 433 new Case("case77", "verifier.cpp", false, "verify_invoke_instructions", | |
| 434 "<init> method is not void return", | |
| 435 "Return type must be void in <init> method"), | |
| 436 | |
| 437 new Case("case78", "verifier.cpp", true, "get_newarray_type", | |
| 438 "newarray type invalid", | |
| 439 "Illegal newarray instruction"), | |
| 440 | |
| 441 new Case("case79", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_return_value", | |
| 442 "void return from method which has a return value", | |
| 443 "Method expects a return value"), | |
| 444 | |
| 445 new Case("case80", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_return_value", | |
| 446 "TOS type does not match signature", | |
| 447 "Bad return type"), | |
| 448 | |
| 449 new Case("case81", "verifier.cpp", true, "verify_stackmap_table", | |
| 450 "stack map does not match (flags)", | |
| 451 "Instruction type does not match stack map") | |
| 452 }; | |
| 453 } | |
| 454 | |
| 455 public class Test7116786 { | |
| 456 public static void main(String argv[]) throws Exception { | |
| 457 for (Case c : VerifyErrorCases.cases) { | |
| 458 System.out.println("******** " + c.getCaseName() + " ********"); | |
| 459 if (c.isTestable()) { | |
| 460 try { | |
| 461 ClassLoader cl = Test7116786.class.getClassLoader(); | |
| 462 Class<?> cls = Class.forName(c.getCaseName(), true, cl); | |
| 463 throw new RuntimeException( | |
| 464 "++ FAIL: No verify error encountered"); | |
| 465 } catch (VerifyError ve) { | |
| 466 String message = c.getMessage(); | |
| 467 String veMessage = ve.getMessage(); | |
| 468 System.out.print(veMessage); | |
| 469 if (!veMessage.startsWith(message)) { | |
| 470 // We're not seeing the message we expect. Could be | |
| 471 // that we've gotten the wrong VerifyError case, or | |
| 472 // maybe the message changed. | |
| 473 System.out.println("++ FAIL? " + | |
| 474 "Message does not match what was expected: " + | |
| 475 message); | |
| 476 continue; | |
| 477 } | |
| 478 if (!veMessage.contains("Exception Details:") && | |
| 479 !veMessage.contains("Reason:")) { | |
| 480 System.out.println("++ FAIL: No details found"); | |
| 481 throw new RuntimeException("FAIL: No details found"); | |
| 482 } | |
| 483 System.out.println("++ PASS"); | |
| 484 } | |
| 485 } else { | |
| 486 System.out.println("++ SKIPPED"); | |
| 487 } | |
| 488 } | |
| 489 } | |
| 490 } |