--- a/src/cpu/x86/vm/x86_32.ad	Tue Jun 01 11:48:33 2010 -0700
+++ b/src/cpu/x86/vm/x86_32.ad	Wed Jun 02 22:45:42 2010 -0700
@@ -1377,6 +1377,12 @@
 // registers?  True for Intel but false for most RISCs
 const bool Matcher::clone_shift_expressions = true;
 
+bool Matcher::narrow_oop_use_complex_address() {
+  ShouldNotCallThis();
+  return true;
+}
+
+
 // Is it better to copy float constants, or load them directly from memory?
 // Intel can load a float constant from a direct address, requiring no
 // extra registers.  Most RISCs will have to materialize an address into a
@@ -1841,14 +1847,14 @@
     MacroAssembler _masm(&cbuf);
     // RBP is preserved across all calls, even compiled calls.
     // Use it to preserve RSP in places where the callee might change the SP.
-    __ movptr(rbp, rsp);
+    __ movptr(rbp_mh_SP_save, rsp);
     debug_only(int off1 = cbuf.code_size());
     assert(off1 - off0 == preserve_SP_size(), "correct size prediction");
   %}
 
   enc_class restore_SP %{
     MacroAssembler _masm(&cbuf);
-    __ movptr(rsp, rbp);
+    __ movptr(rsp, rbp_mh_SP_save);
   %}
 
   enc_class Java_Static_Call (method meth) %{    // JAVA STATIC CALL
@@ -13570,7 +13576,7 @@
 // Call Java Static Instruction (method handle version)
 // Note: If this code changes, the corresponding ret_addr_offset() and
 //       compute_padding() functions will have to be adjusted.
-instruct CallStaticJavaHandle(method meth, eBPRegP ebp) %{
+instruct CallStaticJavaHandle(method meth, eBPRegP ebp_mh_SP_save) %{
   match(CallStaticJava);
   predicate(((CallStaticJavaNode*)n)->is_method_handle_invoke());
   effect(USE meth);